Confusion about iterator types

[Kirby Urner]

Martin von Loewis <loewis at informatik.hu-berlin.de> wrote:

>Kirby Urner <urner at alumni.princeton.edu> writes:

>I personally see no advantage in having it renamed, if you do, feel
>free to submit a feature request at sf.net/projects/python. If you can
>point to an actual problem that the current name causes, you should
>make it a bug report.
>

No, just trying to sort it out in my own mind at this point.  

>> And again, there's no 'callable-iterator' type in types.
>
>Sure is, it is called FunctionIterType. callable-iterator would not be
>valid identifier...
>
>Regards,
>Martin

OK, that was helpful.  Thanks loads.

Kirby