Wholly unnecessary flame. (was Re: pyXML!)

[Martin von Loewis]

root at 127.0.0.1 (David) writes:

> But do note that several people have agreed that there are some deep
> problems with the current XML implementation.  Feel free to review the
> thread and pick out those messages that have content.

If, by current, you mean the 0.6.0 release, or the current CVS code,
can you please name a few deep problems?

> I just spent a good forty-five minutes reading every posting made to the
> XML-SIG mailing list during September.  It's become clear to me that the
> XML code is highly experimental and is not intended for public consumption.

Can you point to a few messages in the XML-SIG mailing list in
September that indicate that this is the case?

Regards,
Martin