On Tue, 17 Oct 2000 21:13:28 -0400, Mark Cunningham <mcunni01 at uoguelph.ca> wrote: > >I had 0x1l and i thought it would be the same thing as 0x1L, but its >not, thanks! > It is the same on my machine, both 1.5.2 and 2.0. Maybe you were using 0x1 without either l or L. Huaiyu