Tutorials at IPC9

[Aahz Maruch]

In article <39591877.535A96BC at sage.att.com>,
Garry Hodgson  <garry at sage.att.com> wrote:
>
>I'm starting to think about what kinds of tutorials we should have at
>the next Python conference.  The last conference had a number of great
>tutorials available (see http://www.python.org/workshops/2000-01/tut/
>for descriptions).  But I'm wondering what, if anything, we should
>change this year.  So I thought I'd try and get a sense of people's
>thinking on this.  If you were at IPC8, what did you like, or dislike,
>about the tutorials you attended?  If you skipped the tutorials, what
>might have tempted you to attend?  Would you prefer more tutorials
>covering different subjects?  Or fewer, covering things in more
>depth?

To what extent should people not at IPC8 involve themselves in this
discussion?
--
                      --- Aahz (Copyright 2000 by aahz at netcom.com)

Androgynous poly kinky vanilla queer het    <*>     http://www.rahul.net/aahz/
Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule 6

The best way to get information on Usenet is not to ask a question,
but to post the wrong information.  --Aahz