More about variables
Matthew Hirsch
meh9 at cornell.edu
Thu Apr 6 14:24:00 EDT 2000
Why create named variables?
I always thought that having 20 lists saved more space than having one
list of 20 lists. Maybe I'm wrong.
Thanks for your help,
Matt
In article <3X3H4.16435$0o4.108310 at iad-read.news.verio.net>,
culliton at clark.net (Tom Culliton) wrote:
> What (or maybe what do you think) you are trying to do? Most likely
> you would be better off with just a list or tuple if you're dealing
> with and unknown number of data items. Not everything needs a name,
> and there isn't much difference between:
>
> v0, v1, v2, v3, v4, v5
>
> and
>
> v[0], v[1], v[2], v[3], v[4], v[5]
>
> Why do you think this variable length collection of data needs
> individual names?
>
> Now, if after consideration there is still some compelling reason to
> generate names, you can use something like this with a dictionary
> (possibly the one returned by globals()):
>
> v = {}
> for i in range(number_of_variables):
> name = "variable%d" % i
> v[name] = []
>
> But again, Why?
>
> In article <meh9-5C17A0.10445406042000 at news.cit.cornell.edu>,
> Matthew Hirsch <meh9 at cornell.edu> wrote:
> >Hi All,
> >
> >Let's say I had something like:
> >
> >number_of_variables=int(raw_input('Enter number of variables: '))
> >
> >if number_of_variables==1:
> > variable1=[]
> >elif number_of_variables==2:
> > variable1=[]
> > variable2=[]
> >elif number_of_variables==3:
> > variable1=[]
> > variable2=[]
> > variable3=[]
> >elif number_of_variables==4:
> > variable1=[]
> > variable2=[]
> > variable3=[]
> > variable4=[]
> >elif number_of_variables==5:
> > variable1=[]
> > variable2=[]
> > variable3=[]
> > variable4=[]
> > variable5=[]
> >else:
> > print 'else'
> >
> >Is there a more efficient way of doing this? What if I wanted to create
> >100 variables (lists). It doesn't make sense to write an if statement
> >for that many conditions.
> >
> >Thanks for your help,
> >Matt
More information about the Python-list
mailing list