[Python-Dev] provisional status for asyncio

[Yury Selivanov]

On 2015-08-28 11:44 AM, Brett Cannon wrote:
>
>     Unfortunately, separating it from the standard library is something
>     that I don't think we can do so late in the 3.5 release candidates
>     process.
>
>
> Ultimately it's Larry's call, but I don't see why we couldn't. If we 
> were talking about something as low-level as the urllib package then I 
> would agree, but beyond its own tests is there anything in the stdlib 
> that depends on asyncio?

As Victor already replied, asyncio is pretty self contained, and
nothing in the stdlib depends on it.

If we really can remove it, let's consider it.

Yury