[Python-Dev] PEP 492 vs. PEP 3152, new round

[Yury Selivanov]

Guido,

On 2015-04-29 7:52 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 4:48 PM, Yury Selivanov <yselivanov.ml at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Nathaniel,
>>
>> On 2015-04-29 7:35 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>>
>>> What I do feel strongly about
>>> is that whatever syntax we end up with, there should be*some*
>>> accurate human-readable description of*what it is*. AFAICT the PEP
>>> currently doesn't have that.
>>>
>> How to define human-readable description of how unary
>> minus operator works?
>>
> In a PEP you should probably give grammar that is not the actual grammar
> from the implementation, but matches the grammar used in the reference
> manual on docs.python.org.
>
Will do!

Thanks,
Yury