[Python-Dev] PEP 492 vs. PEP 3152, new round

[Guido van Rossum]

On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 4:48 PM, Yury Selivanov <yselivanov.ml at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Nathaniel,
>
> On 2015-04-29 7:35 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>
>> What I do feel strongly about
>> is that whatever syntax we end up with, there should be*some*
>> accurate human-readable description of*what it is*. AFAICT the PEP
>> currently doesn't have that.
>>
>
> How to define human-readable description of how unary
> minus operator works?
>

In a PEP you should probably give grammar that is not the actual grammar
from the implementation, but matches the grammar used in the reference
manual on docs.python.org.

-- 
--Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20150429/32a83aa6/attachment.html>