[Python-Dev] Document performance requirements?
Armin Rigo
arigo at tunes.org
Mon Jul 24 14:56:40 CEST 2006
Hi Giovanni,
On Sun, Jul 23, 2006 at 03:30:50PM +0200, Giovanni Bajo wrote:
> I'm not sure big-O tells the whole truth. For instance, do we want to allow
> an implementation to use a hash table as underlying type for a list? It
> would match big-O requirements, but would still be slower than a plain array
> because of higher overhead of implementation (higher constant factor).
A big-O difference can make the difference between a program that takes
0.5 seconds or 2 hours to run. This is more important than a constant
factor difference, which different implementations are bound to exhibit
anyway.
> And if this is allowed, I would like to find in CPython tutorials and
> documentations a simple statement like: "to implement the list and match its
> requirements, CPython choose a simple array as underlying data structure".
Yes, the big-O notes don't have to be too technical: the docs should
tell people to think about Python lists as simple arrays, and the O
requirements follow naturally.
A bientot,
Armin
More information about the Python-Dev
mailing list