Thomas Wouters wrote: > In other words: it's a mess. It sure is. You don't want to change the DB implementation used if it worked in 2.1. I believe that different DBs use different storage formats. People would not be happy if they upgraded to a point release and all their DBs broke (i.e. with 2.1 dbm was actually gdbm but with 2.1.1 it is db1). Neil