Andrew M. Kuchling wrote: > There are more things in 1.6 that might require fixing existing code: > str(2L) returning '2', the int/long changes, the Unicode changes, and > if it gets added, garbage collection -- and bugs caused by those > changes might not be catchable by a nanny. hey, you make it sound like "1.6" should really be "2.0" ;-) </F>