[Mailman-Users] The last release from the GNU Mailman project
Jim Popovitch
jimpop at domainmail.org
Fri Feb 28 13:24:19 EST 2020
On Fri, 2020-02-28 at 10:07 -0800, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> On 2/28/20 6:17 AM, Jim Popovitch via Mailman-Users wrote:
> > On Fri, 2020-02-28 at 19:52 +0900, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> > > Brian Carpenter writes:
> > >
> > > > I have hired a professional PHP developer to begin work on a new
> > > > admin/forum interface for Mailman 3.
> > >
> > > Too bad. I really sympathize with your goals but am unlikely to be
> > > able to contribute directly to implementation (assuming an eventual
> > > open-sourcing). Never learned PHP, not going to do it anytime soon.
> >
> > Stephen, It's difficult for me to parse your thought process on this.
> > Why do you say "Too bad" about someone wanting to improve something that
> > you admit you want no part of?
>
> Well, Steve channeled me earlier, so I'll return the favor. I think
> Steve is saying "Too bad" he is only talking about the choice of PHP as
> a platform rather than Python. We absolutely encourage people to develop
> alternatives to Postorius and HyperKitty for archiving and web
> management of Mailman. I think all Steve is saying is he could be more
> helpful with Python as opposed to PHP.
>
> See this paragraph:
>
> > > That's OK, the point of REST is so *you* *can* do that. I can only
> > > speak for myself, but we can help to some extent on the Python side of
> > > the REST interface.
>
>
> > Who is this "we", you referenced them a few times in this email.
>
> See the initial paragraph in the Acknowledgements section at
> <https://www.list.org/>;.
>
>
>
> > I'm fairly confident in saying that Mark has said (repeatedly now) that
> > there will never ever ever ever ever be another Mailman2 release beyond
> > v2.1.30. Stephen, why do you say there will be? Do you have the project
> > authority to make that statement? Who do I beleive?
>
> Actually, I have said there will not be another release from the GNU
> Mailman project. That does not preclude anyone from forking that project
> from Launchpad and doing whatever with it.
I get that, but that sounds sharply different than what Stephen was
saying.
> I personally am not interested in porting Mailman 2 to Python 3. That's
> already been done. The result, with a real backend database and some
> extensions such as the concept of "user" that doesn't exist in MM 2, is
> Mailman 3 core.
>
>
> > What I'm reading between the lines is that
> > nothing but Django was considered for MM3 (by "we") and everything else
> > is inferior and not worth the time. I'd love to be wrong on that.
>
> The web based archiving and list management we distribute are based on
> Django because that's how the people who developed those things wanted
> to do it.
>
> The whole point of Mailman 3 is all that stuff is separate from the core
> engine and communicates with core via a REST API, so there can be lots
> of different web management UIs. We knew if we released Mailman 3 core
> only without a web UI for list management and archive access, no one
> would use it, so we needed those things and the people who were willing
> to implement them built what we have.
>
> We certainly hoped that there would be people like Brian implementing
> alternatives and we're glad to see it.
>
> > > Agreed. I didn't even know bounce processing wasn't working until
> > > this summer (my production lists are all in-house to personal
> > > acquaintances to same-university addresses -- if mail isn't flowing to
> > > somebody, it's not going to anybody, even Mailman!)
> >
> > MM3 has been on python.org for a while, was it not noticed there either?
>
> Of course. We began discussing this almost 3 years ago
> <https://gitlab.com/mailman/mailman/issues/343#note_31870366>;. The
> implementation was mostly done last year by a GSOC student.
I think that is Brian's and a lot of other people's concern. 3 years to
implement something into MM3 that was a core feature in MM2. I realize
this next question is going to sound bombastic, I assure you it's not
meant that way: What other things are missing or not available
presently in MM3 that are taken for granite in MM2?
> We are a small project. We have very few people working on Mailman on a
> regular basis, and everyone is a volunteer, no one is paid. If you want
> things to happen faster, please contribute.
>
~$ grep "Jim Popovitch" ~/devel/Mailman/NEWS | wc -l
10
I don't think that I've been sitting on the fence, in fact I think I've
been contributing a lot if you include not just source contributions but
also the PPAs. I wouldn't say that I'm a principal developer, but I'm
not off in some remote corner unfamiliar with the product and project.
-Jim P.
More information about the Mailman-Users
mailing list