[Mailman-Users] Add PayPal to DNs publishing DMARC p=reject

[Mark Sapiro]

On 05/07/2014 05:41 PM, Peter Shute wrote:
> 
> If it means that Reply vs Reply All work differently for list messages from different domains, will it only lead to users becoming hopelessly confused? Is there anyone who's already using this who could report on the reactions from users?


It depends. If your MUA offers 'reply to list' that works in all cases
to just reply to the list.

Otherwise, if first_strip_reply-to is No and reply_goes_to_list is
Poster, in the case of From: munging or wrapping, reply will go to the
poster and the poster's original Reply-To: and reply-all will go to the
list. This is slightly different from the un-munged/wrapped case in that
if the poster had an original Reply-To: with a different address, the
poster's From: will be included in 'reply', but basically it's unchanged
in spirit - reply is to the poster and reply-all includes the list.

In the other cases, it is similar except, e.g. if reply_goes_to_list is
This list, simple reply will address the poster as well as the list, but
in most cases, the poster is a list member and would have gotten it anyway.

The intent is to make munged/wrapped behavior as close as possible to
the un-munged/wrapped behavior except that exposing the poster's address
takes priority.

-- 
Mark Sapiro <mark at msapiro.net>        The highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay Area, California    better use your sense - B. Dylan