[Mailman-Users] Privacy Options Filtering
Mark Sapiro
mark at msapiro.net
Wed Jun 5 02:02:43 CEST 2013
On 06/04/2013 01:25 AM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
>
> > OK. This is a bug. I have entered it in the tracker at
> > <https://bugs.launchpad.net/mailman/+bug/1187201> and I will fix it, but
> > I'm not yet sure how. And the filter does continue to work for all
> > addresses, even the bad ones.
>
> Well, is it a bug? It seems to me that depends on whether the setting
> is REJECT (it's a bug, although only wasting the MTA's time AFAICS) or
> DISCARD (not a bug). If it's DISCARD, surely the admin intends to
> nuke that spammer in the future, too? I don't know if this argument
> applies to evil characters in the address but it should be true for
> invalid domains.
The bug is only that if you select "Add <invalid address> to one of
these sender filters:" Mailman will add the address to one of the
*_these_nonmembers filters and later you will be unable to edit that
filter through the web UI unless and until you remove the invalid address.
> > That's my inclination for the fix. I.e. don't add the address to the
> > filter and say why, but what else should or shouldn't be done. E.g.
> > suppose this is one address out of 5 to be added from 5 posts. Do we
> > abort the whole transaction, do everything else anyway or something in
> > between.
>
> I would say Mailman should (1) add all the valid addresses, (2) give
> an error message specifying any addresses Mailman rejected, followed
> (3, in the same page) by a confirmation message saying which addresses
> were added. Also, it might be useful to *prepend* the new addresses
> to the list or regexp.
I've started to implement (1) and (2). (3) may or may not be tricky, but
I'll see.
--
Mark Sapiro <mark at msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan
More information about the Mailman-Users
mailing list