[Mailman-Users] Bounce processing questions (feature, or bug?)

[Mark Sapiro]

Hank van Cleef wrote:
>
>However, I've also gotten about fifty other bounce disables on the 2.0
>score.  Some investigation shows that affected users had accumulated
>two bounces several months ago, but none since.  From what I see in
>the bounce logs still in my rotation, it appears that the bounce
>processor did not sense that these bounces were very stale (over 90
>days, when I've specified 4), but simply operated on my reducing the
>score from 3.0 to 2.0.  A couple of users have forwarded back the
>bounce e-mail they received and have noted the "last bounce dates" in
>March-April. 
>
>Mailman version is 2.1.9, local build with Python 2.4.3 on Solaris 9.


Fixed in 2.1.10.

See <http://www.msapiro.net/scripts/reset_bounce.py> (mirrored at
<http://fog.ccsf.edu/~msapiro/scripts/reset_bounce.py>) for a withlist
script to do a mass re-enable by domain.

-- 
Mark Sapiro <mark at msapiro.net>        The highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay Area, California    better use your sense - B. Dylan