[Mailman-Users] multiple header_filter_rules?

[Mark Sapiro]

David R Bosso wrote:
>
>Rule 1 is (I thought) Match Return-Path:, only if it's not followed by 
>dbosso at lsit.ucsb.edu.  This should discard for any Return Path but my email 
>address, did you modify it to match yours, or do I have the (?!...) syntax 
>wrong?


My mistake. I didn't really look at the Rule 1 pattern. The pattern is
correct for what you want and it works. It didn't discard my test
messages because my test setup uses Exim and Exim's pipe driver
doesn't add a Return-Path: header, so rule 1 didn't match because
there was no Return-Path: at all.

I retested using bin/inject to deliver the messages. A message with

Return-path: <msapiro at value.net>
Subject: test

was discarded by rule 1. A message with

Return-path: <dbosso at lsit.ucsb.edu>
Subject: test

was held by rule 2, so I am still unable to duplicate the problem.

What's in Mailman's vette log for the discarded message that should be
held by rule 2?

If that doesn't offer a clue, I suggest you get
<http://mailman.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/*checkout*/mailman/branches/Release_2_1-maint/mailman/Mailman/Handlers/SpamDetect.py?revision=7750>
and compare it to your Mailman/Handlers/SpamDetect.py to see if there
is any difference.

-- 
Mark Sapiro <msapiro at value.net>       The highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay Area, California    better use your sense - B. Dylan