[Mailman-Users] Installation Issue

[Seth Vidal]

> Maybe this doesn't belong on this list, but what's the motivation behind
> installing all of mailman into it's own heirarchy?  I'd think that it would
> be much more "FHS Compliant" to break things up and put them throughout the
> filesystem where they "belong".  Any decent package management system should
> be able to keep track of where files are installed, and that's the only good
> motivation that I can think of for putting mailman on its own.

I'd like to second this statement.
fhs compliance would be a plus - or at least ease of configuration to fhs
compliance. It would make rpm and deb building MUCH easier.
instead of symlinking everywhere.

-sv