[Mailman-i18n] Subject lines in Archives

[Ben Gertzfield]

>>>>> "Martin" =3D=3D Martin v L=F6wis <loewis@informatik.hu-berlin.de> wri=
tes:

    Ben> Or we could give an option to replace text that could not be
    Ben> converted to Unicode with a message, eh?  What's the harm in
    Ben> allowing both?

    Martin> Who would be controlling this option, and how? If the list
    Martin> admin: why is she in a better position to make a decision
    Martin> than we are?

I think the list admin should have the right to decide if they do not
wish their customers' terminals to get messed up when browsing
illegally encoded text.

Ben

--=20
Brought to you by the letters J and Z and the number 18.
"Sculch is junk."
Debian GNU/Linux maintainer of Gimp and Nethack -- http://www.debian.org/