[Mailman-Developers] Postorius issue tracker labels

[Simon Hanna]

>>I'm not sure "rest" is the way it's currently being used either: it
>might be
>>more useful to rename it to be like the wait-for-mailman tag to
>indicate bugs
>>that occur due to mailmanclient.
>
>'wait-for-mailman' is just a little weird given that we use the term
>'mailman'
>for the whole umbrella project.  'wait-for-core' is a little better but
>it
>doesn't accurately describe blockers on mailman.client. 
>'wait-for-api'?  I'm
>also okay with leaving it as it us until/unless we figure out something
>better.

In most cases I think we would have to wait for both core and mailmanclient. Thats why I don't think we need two labels for it. 
In my opinion it would be better to have only one label and always link to an issue in mailmanclient and/or core