[Mailman-Developers] Don't trust X-No-Archive to keep your secrets.
J.B. Nicholson-Owens
jbn at forestfield.org
Thu Feb 12 19:50:49 CET 2015
Andrew Daviel wrote:
> I found "X-No-Archive" in wikipedia that was apparently honored by
> google when archiving usenet.
Keep in mind that all archivers probably archive the message anyway but
might treat "X-No-Archive: yes" as a cue to not release that message to
public queries. In other words, "X-No-Archive: yes" netnews posts are
archived right alongside all the other posts and Google employees can
find them in Google's repository of netnews posts.
I believe this is the case for two reasons:
1. Structurally: Few search engine companies will throw away an
opportunity to collect data when there's so much for that organization
to gain by indexing that data.
2. Specific to Google: When Google took on DejaNews's archive of Usenet
posts Google's search engine Google released copies of posts labeled
"X-No-Archive: yes" for a while.
Overall, I think people are better off understanding that their
boilerplate is not binding on most people (if anyone) and they need to
be more careful in what they send.
More information about the Mailman-Developers
mailing list