[Mailman-Developers] anti-spam filter
Stephen J. Turnbull
stephen at xemacs.org
Sat Apr 20 06:22:46 CEST 2013
Barry Warsaw writes:
> There are several ways to think about it, but I guess the easiest
> one is "does this chunk of processing change the message or make a
> non-destructive moderation decision?" Or more simply, "is it
> moderation or modification?"
At least for me, the concept is not a problem. The issue is (mental)
duck-typing, that's all.
> Aside: I wanted to find a better name than "handler" for the modification
> bits, but I failed. I would have rather done away with the term "handler" in
> MM3 so suggestions are welcome for the term naming the units that plug into
> the modification pipeline.
+1
More information about the Mailman-Developers
mailing list