[Mailman-Developers] suggested improvement for Mailman's bounce processing

[Brad Knowles]

At 11:21 AM +0100 2006-08-10, Ian Eiloart wrote:

>  It's not necessary to understand all interpretations. There are a few
>  codes that mean the remote address isn't available. When we see any
>  other code, we should not count the bounce against the specific
>  address, because the error isn't related to that address.

As I said, show me the code, and then show me all the actual bounces 
and how they were interpreted by the code.  I'd like to see how 
closely reality actually hews to the RFCs.

-- 
Brad Knowles, <brad at stop.mail-abuse.org>

"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little
temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."

     -- Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790), reply of the Pennsylvania
     Assembly to the Governor, November 11, 1755

  Founding Individual Sponsor of LOPSA.  See <http://www.lopsa.org/>.