[Mailman-Developers] why treat action: delayed in DSN as an unrecognized bounce?

[Brad Knowles]

At 2:32 PM -0400 2004-07-04, Brian J. Murrell wrote:

>  Why is delayed not handled more gracefully than treating it as an
>  unknown bounce type?  Or am I totally missing something here?

	Search the archives.  I believe you'll find that the answer is 
that you (the mailing list administrator) should have control over 
the MTA, and if you don't want warnings to be treated the same as 
bounces, then you should configure the MTA so that it doesn't 
generate warnings.

	But you should search the archives to get the full picture of 
previous discussions.

-- 
Brad Knowles, <brad.knowles at skynet.be>

"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
     -Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania.

   SAGE member since 1995.  See <http://www.sage.org/> for more info.