[Mailman-Developers] Bug priorities (for 2.1.3)?

[Bob Puff at NLE]

Where is your fix for this bug?


---------- Original Message -----------
From: Bernhard Reiter <bernhard at intevation.de>
To: mailman-developers at python.org
Sent: Thu, 2 Oct 2003 09:22:19 +0200
Subject: [Mailman-Developers] Bug priorities (for 2.1.3)?

> Congratulation for getting 2.1.3 out of the door!
> 
> I have a question and a remark regarding the handling of bugs:
> 
> * What attributes do bugs need to get into the next release
>   when a fix is available. As announced on the 14th of August to this
>   list I fixed a priority 7 bug and did not receive feedback on it.
>   Is there a special reason why it wasn't included in the 2.1.3 release?
>   [ 665732 ] List-Id should be one line.
> 
> * There is a very annoying bug (reproduced with 2.1.2, 2.1.3 test
>   scheduled) in environments where people sign their emails, 
>   because Mailman breaks the signature. 
> 
>  [ 815297 ] Breaking signatures in message/rfc822 attachement!
>  http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=815297&group_id=103&atid=100103
> 
>   I suggest raising the priority of this bug, 
>   because it might give Mailman a bad reputation with 
>   security aware people. 
>   And once established such an image is hard to loose again.
> 
> Cheers,
> 	Bernhard 
> 
> -- 
> Professional Service for Free Software                 
> (intevation.net)  The FreeGIS Project                                
>        (freegis.org) Association for a Free Informational 
> Infrastructure          (ffii.org) FSF Europe                        
>                       (fsfeurope.org)
------- End of Original Message -------