[Mailman-Developers] Indirect Spam Vulnerability

[Simone Piunno]

On Thursday 19 June 2003 00:38, Matt Helsley wrote:

> I have two lists:  foo at myhost.com
>                    moderated at myhost.com
>
> The spammer sends forged as foo at myhost.com to moderated at myhost.com. The
> mail gets held for approval and a message gets sent to foo at myhost.com
> informing it that the message has been held (often times the subject line
> is mentioned and contains lewd content which I'd rather not have sent out
> to subscribers on foo at myhost.com).

shouldn't the "held-for-approval" notification be sent as Precedence: bulk and 
therefore silently discarded by list foo?

-- 
My homepage -> http://www.google.com/search?q=simone%20piunno