[Mailman-Developers] Does mailman-cvs remove reply-to?
Marc MERLIN
marc_news@vasoftware.com
Sun, 10 Mar 2002 22:01:36 -0800
On Mon, Mar 11, 2002 at 12:49:05AM -0500, Barry A. Warsaw wrote:
>
> >>>>> "MM" == Marc MERLIN <marc_news@vasoftware.com> writes:
>
> MM> On my test list, which doesn't have reply-to munging enabled,
> MM> if I send a test post with a reply-to header, it doesn't make
> MM> it to the list (or to ToOutgoing for that matter)
>
> MM> Before I look into this deeper, is this just me?
>
> Look for first_strip_reply_to under the General category. :)
I did, but:
('first_strip_reply_to', mm_cfg.Radio, (_('No'), _('Yes')), 0,
_('''Before adding a list-specific <tt>Reply-To:</tt> header,
should any existing <tt>Reply-To:</tt> field be stripped from
the message?''')),
This implies (and I just checked in Cookheaders) that stripping should only
occur if I have reply-to munging turned on, which in my case, is not
something very likely :-)
Basically, I'm saying that if I post to a list without reply-to munging, if
I set (as a poster) a reply-to, it doesn't make it to the list.
(I just checked on 2 other machines where I have mailman-cvs installed)
Marc
PS: As a pointer, if the message gets automatically rejected and sent back
to the sender, the Reply-To is still there
--
Microsoft is to operating systems & security ....
.... what McDonalds is to gourmet cooking
Home page: http://marc.merlins.org/ | Finger marc_f@merlins.org for PGP key