[Mailman-Developers] current snapshot install...
Ron Jarrell
jarrell@vt.edu
Sun, 24 Feb 2002 21:42:34 -0500
At 12:24 AM 2/24/02 -0500, you wrote:
> >>>>> "RJ" == Ron Jarrell <jarrell@vt.edu> writes:
>
> RJ> Updated my snapshot, and was playing with install. Install
> RJ> *really* shouldn't depend on someone having installed a tar
> RJ> that understands the "z" option.
>
>Yeah, I know that. The command should be rewritten to use gunzip
>piping to tar. Can we count on that existing some place? If there
>are doubts, we can add a configure test w/ a warning if those progs
>are missing.
I'd imagine upwards of 90% of systems out there have gunzip.
Or maybe just use gzip -d. It would, however, add another
required component, and this one just for one itty bit of the
install. Honestly, since you're distributing everything as a compressed
tarball already, do really need to also compress email? Just
ship it as a straight tar, or, better yet, ship it as an untarred tree...
>
> RJ> And, given that the rest of the install stresses doing things
> RJ> are yourself, it really shouldn't be trying to install the
> RJ> email kit anyway - I've *never* installed mailman as something
> RJ> that *could* install a new python module...
>
>That's the point of the change, Mailman does not (now) install the
>email package into some place that will affect your normal Python
>environment. It installs it in a place that only Mailman will use.
Ah. I didn't study the actual makefile commands far enough
to notice that. I just the the "grumble grumble what in hell are you
doing barry grumble grumble" comment out the offending part
command... :-)