[Mailman-Developers] SF bug report #223533
Norbert Bollow
nb@thinkcoach.com
Sat, 6 Apr 2002 11:02:20 +0200
Barry A. Warsaw <barry@zope.com> wrote:
> So, to summarize, my proposal is:
>
> - List-Id: is included in all messages pertaining to a list, including
> both postings and admin messages.
>
> - List-Help:, List-Subscribe:, List-Unsubscribe:, and List-Post: are
> added only to postings. (Oh, and optionally List-Archive:).
Yup. Makes sense.
Chuq Von Rospach <chuqui@plaidworks.com> wrote:
> > It makes sense to me. If I were writing some filter on messages, I'd
> > look for the List-ID to figure out which list this message pertains
> > to, then I'd look for List-Post to see if this were a list posting or
> > an admin message (it's absence would mean "admin message").
>
> That's easy in procmail. In most gui clients, it's impossible.
This can be addressed by filtering on the Sender: header. My
reading of the RFC is that we should add a well-defined Sender:
header to admin messages that we create, e.g.
Sender: mailman-owner@example.com
while we shouldn't add such a header for outgoing list mail.
Greetings, Norbert.
--
A founder of the http://DotGNU.org project and Steering Committee member
Norbert Bollow, Weidlistr.18, CH-8624 Gruet (near Zurich, Switzerland)
Tel +41 1 972 20 59 Fax +41 1 972 20 69 http://thinkcoach.com
List hosting with GNU Mailman on your own domain name http://cisto.com