[Mailman-Developers] Re: [Mailman-checkins] CVS:
mailman/messages Makefile.in,2.1,2.2
Barry A. Warsaw
barry@digicool.com
Tue, 29 May 2001 14:54:35 -0400
>>>>> "BAW" == Barry A Warsaw <barry@digicool.com> writes:
BAW> So, I'm not concerned about GNU-make-isms for "make
BAW> catalogs". That's why "make all" and "make install" don't
BAW> depend on any of the generated files. I should probably add
BAW> a comment to the top of messages/Makefile.in just saying that
BAW> "make catalogs" requires GNU make.
Oh, yeah. I see there was a redundant definition of the .po->.mo file
transformation. I'll bet BSDmake was picking up the broken .po.mo
entry and GNUmake was picking up the full rule down below.
I'll check in a fix for this shortly.
-Barry