[Mailman-Developers] Beta2 - Bug in archiver?
Eric D. Christensen
edc@proadmin.com
Wed, 26 Apr 2000 20:49:17 -0700
Yup... that was it Dan. Thanks! I just applied the diff.... didn't bother
grabbing 1.22 out of CVS. I'll wait for beta 3...
That gets things working enough to actually put one of my lists online with
beta 2 to see what happens. I've been testing for a few days and everything
else seems to be fairly stable. A few weird things here and there, but
overall it mostly seems to work.
I guess I'll find out more when I put a real list on it later this week.
----
Eric D. Christensen
ProAdmin, Inc.
Serious System Administration
(408)776-3410
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dan Mick [mailto:Dan.Mick@West.Sun.COM]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2000 7:42 PM
> To: mailman-developers@python.org; edc@ns.proadmin.com
> Subject: Re: [Mailman-Developers] Beta2 - Bug in archiver?
>
>
> I can't find anything anywhere in 2.0beta2 that defines "SetHeader()".
> That could be a problem. Archiver.py is not supposed to call
> SetHeader() anymore, but apparently, as of 2.0beta2, it still
> does. It appears to be fixed in revision 1.21 of Archiver.py.
> I guess 2.0beta2 is just broken in this respect.
>
> The newer Archiver.py uses "post['Date'] = time.ctime(time.time())"
> in place of "post.SetHeader..."
>
> diff -r1.20 -r1.21
> 160c160
> < post.SetHeader('Date', time.ctime(time.time()))
> ---
> > post['Date'] = time.ctime(time.time())
> 173c173
> < post.SetHeader('Date', olddate)
> ---
> > post['Date'] = olddate
> 192c192
> < if mm_cfg.ARCHIVE_TO_MBOX == -1:
> ---
> > if mm_cfg.ARCHIVE_TO_MBOX == -1 or not self.archive:
>
>
> (There's also a revision 1.22, so I don't really advocate using this..)
>
> > I've poked at this a little but I'm not making any headway. Not
> being very
> > python literate, it's probably something simple that I'm
> missing. Nontheless,
> I
> > figured I'd bounce it off the experts....
> >
> > This is 2.0Beta2 running under Mandrake Linux on a PIII with
> sendmail 8.9.3.
> > Python version is: Python 1.5.2 (#1, Apr 25 2000, 12:39:13)
> [GCC pgcc-2.91.66
> 19990314 (egcs-1.1.2 on linux2
> >
> > Seems to be a hole somewhere related to the date parsing code
> in the archiver.
> >
> > In logs/error I get the following traceback whenever a message
> is posted to
> the list:
> >
> > Apr 25 16:35:05 2000 post(28927): Traceback (innermost last):
> > post(28927): File
> "/home/mailman/Mailman/Archiver/Archiver.py", line 204,
> in ArchiveMail
> > post(28927): self.__archive_to_mbox(msg)
> > post(28927): File
> "/home/mailman/Mailman/Archiver/Archiver.py", line 160,
> in __archive_to_mbox
> > post(28927): post.SetHeader('Date', time.ctime(time.time()))
> > post(28927): AttributeError: SetHeader
> >
> > The message gets forwarded to the list correctly. It just doesn't get
> archived.
> >
> > For what it's worth.... the message looks like this when it
> comes through the
> > list. I don't see anything abviously broken in the headers:
> >
> > From f500-admin@o6.proadmin.com Wed Apr 26 15:26:48 2000
> > Return-Path: <f500-admin@o6.proadmin.com>
> > Received: from o6.proadmin.com (o6.proadmin.com [208.195.160.175])
> > by o3.proadmin.com (8.9.3/8.9.3/ProAdmin) with ESMTP
> id PAA28760
> > for <edc@proadmin.com>; Wed, 26 Apr 2000 15:26:48 -0700
> > Received: from o6.proadmin.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
> > by o6.proadmin.com (8.9.3/8.9.3/ProAdmin) with ESMTP
> id PAA00608
> > for <edc@proadmin.com>; Wed, 26 Apr 2000 15:26:48 -0700
> > Received: from o3.proadmin.com ([199.108.70.172])
> > by o6.proadmin.com (8.9.3/8.9.3/ProAdmin) with ESMTP
> id PAA00603
> > for <f500@o6.proadmin.com>; Wed, 26 Apr 2000 15:26:47 -0700
> > Received: (from edc@localhost)
> > by o3.proadmin.com (8.9.3/8.9.3/ProAdmin) id PAA28756
> > for f500@o6.proadmin.com; Wed, 26 Apr 2000 15:26:42 -0700
> > Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2000 15:26:42 -0700
> > From: "Eric D. Christensen" <edc@ns.proadmin.com>
> > Message-Id: <200004262226.PAA28756@o3.proadmin.com>
> > To: f500@o6.proadmin.com
> > Subject: [F500] test from unix
> > Sender: f500-admin@o6.proadmin.com
> > Errors-To: f500-admin@o6.proadmin.com
> > X-BeenThere: f500@o6.proadmin.com
> > X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta2
> > Precedence: bulk
> > Reply-To: f500@o6.proadmin.com
> > List-Id: The Formula 500 Mailing List <f500.o6.proadmin.com>
> >
> > test
> > _______________________________________________
> > F500 mailing list
> > F500@o6.proadmin.com
> > http://216.139.10.131/mailman/listinfo/f500
> >
> >
> > Any clues would be appreciated - since I obviously don't have one! :-)
> >
> > --
> > ======================================================
> > Eric D. Christensen ProAdmin, Inc.
> > Email: edc@proadmin.com http://www.proadmin.com
> > Phone: 408-776-3410 Fax: 408-776-3420
> > ======================================================
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Mailman-Developers mailing list
> > Mailman-Developers@python.org
> > http://www.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers
>