From ehashman at debian.org  Tue Sep  1 00:37:24 2020
From: ehashman at debian.org (Elana Hashman)
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2020 21:37:24 -0700
Subject: [Wheel-builders] Manylinux + alpine wheel
In-Reply-To: <CAPJVwB=KOaZAvmb5iU6VQzJoxdEVkA1w+cYr80XjQ+wrFerZ=Q@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <q5i5n1dt4v1kcp7hu8fc0ej8.1598935044973@debian.org>

I think this would require writing a musl spec/policy and adding support to auditwheel (and possibly adding a manylinux image/target); did I miss anything? 

- e




	? Original Message ?	


From: njs at pobox.com
Sent: August 31, 2020 6:59 p.m.
To: brendon at r2c.dev
Cc: wheel-builders at python.org
Subject: Re: [Wheel-builders] Manylinux + alpine wheel


Unfortunately, there isn't currently any way to publish pre-built binaries for alpine.



On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 5:46 PM Brendon Go <brendon at r2c.dev> wrote:

Hi All


I'm not sure if this is an appropriate place for this question. Apologies if it isn't.


I want to publish a wheel that contains a pre-built binary that works on manylinux and alpine (a different wheel is needed for osx and windows) and was wondering what platform to mark it as so alpine and ubuntu are able to install that wheel when pip installing. Maybe I'm doing something wrong but twine thinks it is a collision when I upload both a manylinux and a linux platform wheel.


Thanks!
_______________________________________________
Wheel-builders mailing list
Wheel-builders at python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/wheel-builders



--

Nathaniel J. Smith -- https://vorpus.org

From ehashman at debian.org  Sun Sep 20 17:50:12 2020
From: ehashman at debian.org (Elana Hashman)
Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2020 14:50:12 -0700
Subject: [Wheel-builders] Manylinux + alpine wheel
In-Reply-To: <q5i5n1dt4v1kcp7hu8fc0ej8.1598935044973@debian.org>
References: <q5i5n1dt4v1kcp7hu8fc0ej8.1598935044973@debian.org>
Message-ID: <8714bf047734ba2618914c56e9d8ed59@debian.org>

On 2020-08-31 21:37, Elana Hashman wrote:
> I think this would require writing a musl spec/policy and adding
> support to auditwheel (and possibly adding a manylinux image/target);
> did I miss anything?

Following up on this, Nathaniel pointed out to me on IRC that pip would 
also need musl support.

- e