From ncoghlan at gmail.com  Sun Nov 18 08:52:30 2018
From: ncoghlan at gmail.com (Nick Coghlan)
Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2018 23:52:30 +1000
Subject: [Wheel-builders] auditwheel 1.10.0rc1 is now available
In-Reply-To: <20181027212707.GA13071@feralas>
References: <20181027212707.GA13071@feralas>
Message-ID: <CADiSq7cTUnXh=-sCkUQaM5ej0SccKx43N6dwrRbamdXYjAKn3g@mail.gmail.com>

On Sun, 28 Oct 2018 at 07:35, Elana Hashman <ehashman at debian.org> wrote:
>
> Hello from the PyPA sprints in NYC!
>
> I am pleased to announce the 1.10.0rc1 release of auditwheel.[0] The
> release notes can be found on GitHub.[1]
>
> This release is particularly exciting as I have submitted changes to
> ensure that auditwheel should correctly process non-extension wheels
> that contain binary dependencies.[2] As a result, auditwheel can now
> detect and correctly handle binaries in pure wheels.

Very cool!

Cheers,
Nick.

P.S. You anticipated my question about manylinux2010 support, and
pre-emptively answered it :)

-- 
Nick Coghlan   |   ncoghlan at gmail.com   |   Brisbane, Australia

From ehashman at debian.org  Sun Nov 18 17:38:09 2018
From: ehashman at debian.org (Elana Hashman)
Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2018 17:38:09 -0500
Subject: [Wheel-builders] Auditwheel 1.10 and 2.0rc1 releases,
 manylinux2010 support
Message-ID: <20181118223809.GA15210@feralas>

Greetings, programs!

Yesterday I officially released auditwheel 1.10 after no bugs were
reported in the 1.10rc1 release over the last three weeks.[1] Enjoy!

I also worked on getting manylinux2010 support ready in auditwheel and
merged that PR today. I will be shipping manylinux2010 support as part
of auditwheel 2.0rc1 for testing.[2] Please give it a whirl and let me
know if you have any issues.

Note that `auditwheel repair` will always choose the most strict
compatibility tag possible for your wheel. Hence, even if you build in
the manylinux2010 environment, if your wheel only has dependencies on
symbols available in the manylinux1 policy, `repair` will produce a
manylinux1 wheel.

One last thing I worked on this weekend is adding a proper changelog
file to auditwheel.[3] I'm hoping the information contained here,
previously reflected in GitHub releases, will be useful for end users.

Yours in wheel-building,

- e

[1]: https://github.com/pypa/auditwheel/releases/tag/1.10
[2]: https://github.com/pypa/auditwheel/releases/tag/2.0rc1
[3]: https://github.com/pypa/auditwheel/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 949 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/wheel-builders/attachments/20181118/3a100078/attachment.sig>

From robin at reportlab.com  Mon Nov 19 04:42:51 2018
From: robin at reportlab.com (Robin Becker)
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2018 09:42:51 +0000
Subject: [Wheel-builders] Auditwheel 1.10 and 2.0rc1 releases,
 manylinux2010 support
In-Reply-To: <20181118223809.GA15210@feralas>
References: <20181118223809.GA15210@feralas>
Message-ID: <c57da9ac-4923-3cb2-fddb-4a460bf3e2f6@chamonix.reportlab.co.uk>

On 18/11/2018 22:38, Elana Hashman wrote:
> Greetings, programs!
...........
> Yours in wheel-building,
> 
> - e
> 
> [1]: https://github.com/pypa/auditwheel/releases/tag/1.10
> [2]: https://github.com/pypa/auditwheel/releases/tag/2.0rc1
> [3]: https://github.com/pypa/auditwheel/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md
> 
.....

I notice one of the changes for 2.0rc1 is to drop support for Python 3.4; it seems a bit premature to do that since the latest 
release was in August and there's a planned release in 2019. Is there something in manylinux2010 that will prevent Python 3.4 from 
running?
-- 
Robin Becker

From ehashman at debian.org  Thu Nov 22 13:31:33 2018
From: ehashman at debian.org (Elana Hashman)
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2018 13:31:33 -0500
Subject: [Wheel-builders] Auditwheel 1.10 and 2.0rc1 releases,
 manylinux2010 support
In-Reply-To: <c57da9ac-4923-3cb2-fddb-4a460bf3e2f6@chamonix.reportlab.co.uk>
References: <20181118223809.GA15210@feralas>
 <c57da9ac-4923-3cb2-fddb-4a460bf3e2f6@chamonix.reportlab.co.uk>
Message-ID: <20181122183133.GA4782@feralas>

On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 09:42:51AM +0000, Robin Becker wrote:
> 
> I notice one of the changes for 2.0rc1 is to drop support for Python
> 3.4; it seems a bit premature to do that since the latest release
> was in August and there's a planned release in 2019. Is there
> something in manylinux2010 that will prevent Python 3.4 from
> running?

Hi Robin,

To clarify, dropping 3.4 support is just for the auditwheel tool itself:
Python 3.4 wheels will still be supported. Inside the manylinux image,
we run auditwheel with Python 3.6.[1] auditwheel is a Python 3-only
tool, but this does not prevent us from building wheels for Python 2.7
:)

This change is intended to save some time in CI so that we no longer
need to test against Python 3.4 as I introduce support for Python 3.7.
While Python 3.4 is still being maintained, it is nearly 5 years old now
and has only received security fixes since August 2017.[2] While I am
dropping support, I do not believe any changes have been made
intentionally that would cause auditwheel to become Python 3.4
incompatible.

Let me know if this is still a source of concern.

Cheers,

- e


[1]: https://github.com/pypa/manylinux/blob/c24c2e517c57d094616eae8d2e72cb230c9051b6/docker/build_scripts/build.sh#L125-L126
[2]: https://www.python.org/downloads/release/python-347/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 949 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/wheel-builders/attachments/20181122/d34f9a28/attachment.sig>