[Tutor] A Multiple Concatenation Problem

Mark Lawrence breamoreboy at gmail.com
Fri Sep 18 09:57:23 EDT 2020


On 18/09/2020 14:34, Stephen P. Molnar wrote:
> 
> 
> On 09/17/2020 02:00 PM, Alan Gauld via Tutor wrote:
>> On 17/09/2020 18:54, Mats Wichmann wrote:
>>
>>>>>> for suf in range(1, 11):
>>> ...     filename = f"<ligand>{suf}.log"
>>> ...     print(filename)
>>> ...
>>> <ligand>1.log
>>> <ligand>2.log
>>> <ligand>3.log
>>> <ligand>4.log
>>> <ligand>5.log
>>> <ligand>6.log
>>> <ligand>7.log
>>> <ligand>8.log
>>> <ligand>9.log
>>> <ligand>10.log
>>
>> In case that's not clear, Mats is using the new
>> format-string notation.
>> You can use the old style format strings similarly:
>>
>> fmt = "<ligand>.%d.log"
>> for suf in range(1,11):
>>     print(fmt % suf)
>>
>> Or append to a list or...
>> rather than print...
>>
> I read the data in with:
> 
> filename = 'Ligand.list'
> file = open(filename,mode='r')
> text = file.read()
> file.close()
> 
> where Ligand.list, for testing, as at this point I have 31 ligands to 
> process, contains
> 
> 2-Pholoeckol
> 7-Pholoeckol
> 
> If I use either:
> 
> fmt = "<ligand>.%d.log"
> for suf in range(1,11):
>     print(fmt % suf)
> 
> or
> for suf in range(1, 11):
>     filename = f"<ligand>{suf}.log"
>     print(filename)
> 
> I get the same result: 2-Pholoeckol.1.log to 2-Pholoeckol.10.log
>                         7-Pholoeckol.1.log to 7-Pholoeckol.10.log
> 
> Obviously I'm missing something very fundamental, and I'm quite 
> embarrassed by that, but how di I get the ligand name rather than 
> <ligand>... ?
> 

Why not read the data from the file in a loop and process it?  Something 
like (completely untested):-

with open('Ligand.list') as infile:
     for lineno, line in enumerate(infile, start=1):
         filename = f"<line>{lineno}.log"

Or am I completely misreading your needs?

-- 
My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask
what you can do for our language.

Mark Lawrence



More information about the Tutor mailing list