[Tutor] iterators

[Keith Winston]

On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 2:02 PM, Oscar Benjamin
<oscar.j.benjamin at gmail.com> wrote:
> I think that's just an editing mistake. If you replace the word "iterator"
> with "construct" then it makes sense: We have seen that the for statement is
> such a construct.

Fair enough. Thanks. But I think that it underlines the ease with
which the language is used loosely, which does get confusing quickly
when one is still putting together the concepts. I really appreciated
your lengthy post distinguishing iterators from iterables, and I'm
going to go back over it someday that I'm not sick and I have a spare
neuron or two.


-- 
Keith