[Tutor] More type() puzzlement

[Dick Moores]

At 10:27 AM 10/27/2007, Jeff Younker wrote:
>On Oct 27, 2007, at 12:52 PM, Dick Moores wrote:
>>At 08:39 AM 10/27/2007, Aditya Lal wrote:
>>>  Hence if type(n) is already long it does not have to get converted
>>>to int to accommodate something small.
>>
>>And that's not a bug?
>
>There is no need for a type change to represent zero, so, no, that's
>not a bug.

I think I was referring to something like 1000000. And then there's 2**32-1.

Dick