That's the one. I guess I missed that talk. On 3/21/2016 4:21 PM, Chris Calloway wrote: > On 3/21/16 3:09 PM, Rex Dwyer wrote: >> It's regex, the future replacement for re. > > I think he's wondering if it's the same regex he's been using out of > Pypi that he mentioned about in a lightning talk recently: > > https://pypi.python.org/pypi/regex >