[TriZPUG] Wanted: Biased Opinions: Django or Pyramid (Pylons/BFG)?

[Chris Rossi]

On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 2:27 PM, Josh Johnson <jj at email.unc.edu> wrote:

> Good find! I hadn't heard of that, I like WebOb, and having traversal as an
> option is pretty cool, two of the many reasons I was attracted to Pyramid.
>
> I need to do a write up of where we're at now and how we got there. The
> short term answer is at the moment we're using WerkZueg, jinja2 templates,
> mongodb and not much else, and it's pretty sweet.
>
> We're still in the R&D phase, but we should begin the design phase soon,
> and hopefully be doing the first development sprint in the next week or two.
> I think a good output for this stage of the project would be some academic
> assessments of the tools we're using. We're already planning to do some
> write ups of how using a document-based data model compares (apples to
> apples, best we can) to established relational ones. I think doing the same
> for our tool set will be a worthy endeavor.
>
> I think I may do some side-by-side comparisons between Otto and WerkZeug
> and write that up as well. From my first glances it seems to fit the same
> problem domain as WerkZeug, but it uses WebOb instead of it's own
> Request/Response wrapper (I'm pretty sure WerkZeug is not using WebOb under
> the hood), and that sweet-sweet traversal I've come to love from doing Zope
> work (without all the Acquisition Aftertaste)
>
> If you're interested in some widgets in a library that don't assume a
framework, there's also happy:

https://bitbucket.org/chrisrossi/happy

I viewed it primarily as an experiment but everything in there works and has
100% test coverage.  There are dispatchers in there for doing both traversal
and routes.

Chris
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/trizpug/attachments/20110420/583abaa4/attachment.html>