[TriZPUG] informal Triangle Django Users Group starting

[Josh Johnson]

On Nov 12, 2009, at 12:08 PM, Tobias McNulty wrote:
>
> I am +100 all of what you say, but I think the issue is about  
> getting more Django developers on the TriZPUG list in the first  
> place and, on a broader scale,

+1 :)

>
> On that note I still do believe, to reiterate what Paul said, that  
> something with "Django" in the name is a Good Thing(tm).  If nothing  
> more, as a shepherd to bring folks into TriZPUG.
>
I'm still a little weary of that personally, but +1 on the general  
idea, I think what you're doing with the google group and twitter  
directly addresses this goal and that's really great.

Maybe, instead of changing the name of TriZPUG as some have  
suggested*, we take the emphasis out of the "UG" part of the Django  
specific stuff. I don't know what exactly, maybe just something like  
"Triangle Django Users" and then mention heavily that we're all part  
of  the TriZPUG group and point people to the  TriZPUG list and  
website (and meetings). The name probably doesn't matter, but if we  
want to bring more focused groups under our wing (which I think we all  
want), and share resources, we don't want there to be any confusion  
about the affiliation.

JJ

* my suggestions were jokes, in case that wasn't clear :D