[stdlib-sig] MISC/maintainers.txt anyone?

Jesse Noller jnoller at gmail.com
Wed Sep 16 01:10:23 CEST 2009


On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 7:03 PM, Benjamin Peterson <benjamin at python.org> wrote:
> 2009/9/15 Jesse Noller <jnoller at gmail.com>:
>> On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 6:55 PM, Benjamin Peterson <benjamin at python.org> wrote:
>>> Why? It's not meant to be all official-like, just to help people
>>> triaging bugs or having questions about the code. I don't see how it
>>> would benefit the person trying to find out how to use module X in the
>>> official docs.
>>>
>>
>> Having a table in the official docs at least gives people an idea who
>> to +noisy on bugs. How many multiprocessing bugs have you had to
>> reassign, or even *add* me to because people outside of our group
>> don't know?
>
> I see your point, but I think it could be better solved by a auto-nosy
> for the "Components" menu or the ability to tag issues.
>

Well, modulo tracker changes - I still think this could be useful in
the main docs. Not to mention sphinx just makes them so pretty.

jesse


More information about the stdlib-sig mailing list