From lirenlin at gmail.com  Mon Oct 20 06:10:16 2008
From: lirenlin at gmail.com (=?GB2312?B?wO7IysHW?=)
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 12:10:16 +0800
Subject: [stdlib-sig] python in embedded linux
Message-ID: <71a8de040810192110s47bf3aaat2f12c487406c9a16@mail.gmail.com>

I want to know if python can be ported into embedded linux system.and it's
big?
thank you for your help!


-- 
????????????
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/stdlib-sig/attachments/20081020/b880976c/attachment.htm>

From brett at python.org  Mon Oct 20 18:11:11 2008
From: brett at python.org (Brett Cannon)
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 09:11:11 -0700
Subject: [stdlib-sig] python in embedded linux
In-Reply-To: <71a8de040810192110s47bf3aaat2f12c487406c9a16@mail.gmail.com>
References: <71a8de040810192110s47bf3aaat2f12c487406c9a16@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <bbaeab100810200911s6ecba79ft53fe8b2a17fde4a8@mail.gmail.com>

2008/10/19 ??? <lirenlin at gmail.com>:
>
> I want to know if python can be ported into embedded linux system.and it's
> big?
> thank you for your help!
>

This is the wrong place to ask this question. You would be better to
ask on comp.lang.python.

-Brett

From idadesub at users.sourceforge.net  Sat Oct 25 06:55:50 2008
From: idadesub at users.sourceforge.net (Erick Tryzelaar)
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 21:55:50 -0700
Subject: [stdlib-sig] moving queue.Queue to threading.Queue?
Message-ID: <1ef034530810242155h95c1ea0w327459ed1eb83464@mail.gmail.com>

(this mailing list seems to have quieted down a bit, but it seems like
it's the most appropriate place to bring this up).

Now that python has the multiprocessing module that also has it's own
Queue class, would it make sense to move the queue.Queue to the
threading module? I found a reference to this from back in 2007, but
that was before multiprocessing so there might not have been a
compelling reason to move the library. It'd be a little more
orthogonal. That said, it's pretty late to be making any changes to
3.0, but I figure this would be the last time for a long time to
consider doing this.

-e

From brett at python.org  Sat Oct 25 07:44:22 2008
From: brett at python.org (Brett Cannon)
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 22:44:22 -0700
Subject: [stdlib-sig] moving queue.Queue to threading.Queue?
In-Reply-To: <1ef034530810242155h95c1ea0w327459ed1eb83464@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1ef034530810242155h95c1ea0w327459ed1eb83464@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <bbaeab100810242244m394d8a39tccf86ac23e15a2b0@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 9:55 PM, Erick Tryzelaar
<idadesub at users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> (this mailing list seems to have quieted down a bit, but it seems like
> it's the most appropriate place to bring this up).
>
> Now that python has the multiprocessing module that also has it's own
> Queue class, would it make sense to move the queue.Queue to the
> threading module? I found a reference to this from back in 2007, but
> that was before multiprocessing so there might not have been a
> compelling reason to move the library. It'd be a little more
> orthogonal. That said, it's pretty late to be making any changes to
> 3.0, but I figure this would be the last time for a long time to
> consider doing this.
>

No because queue is not threading-specific, it just happens to be the
common use-case.

-Brett