[stdlib-sig] xml-rpc package proposal (was: http package proposal)

[Antoine Pitrou]

Le mardi 29 janvier 2008 à 18:04 -0800, Brett Cannon a écrit :
> On Jan 29, 2008 5:20 PM, Alexandre Vassalotti <alexandre at peadrop.com> wrote:
> > Sounds good. Is there any plan to do a similar packaging with the
> > xmlrpc-related modules? For example,
> >
> >    xmlrpclib -> xmlrpc.tools
> >    SimpleXMLRPCServer -> xmlrpc.server
> >    DocXMLRPCServer -> xmlrpc.server
> 
> I had not gotten that far (just doing them as I find time to bother to
> think about and send an email), but I like your proposal. What do
> others think?

It sounds good. The WeirdCamelCaseModuleNames are simply very annoying.

regards

Antoine.