[stdlib-sig] http package proposal

[Alexandre Vassalotti]

Sounds good. Is there any plan to do a similar packaging with the
xmlrpc-related modules? For example,

   xmlrpclib -> xmlrpc.tools
   SimpleXMLRPCServer -> xmlrpc.server
   DocXMLRPCServer -> xmlrpc.server

-- Alexandre

On Jan 29, 2008 6:38 PM, Brett Cannon <brett at python.org> wrote:
> OK, to keep this ball rolling, here is my suggestion for reorganizing
> HTTP modules:
>
> httplib -> http.tools
> BaseHTTPServer -> http.server
> SimpleHTTPServer -> http.server
> CGIHTTPServer -> http.server
> cookielib -> http.cookies
>
> Since the various HTTP server modules have no name clashes we can
> consolidate them into a single module.
>