[stdlib-sig] Choosing a name for simplejson

[Benjamin Peterson]

On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 4:03 PM, Brett Cannon <brett at python.org> wrote:
> So simplejson is going to be added to the stdlib (this came down from
>  up high, which is why there has not been more of a discussion here).
>  That means we need to choose a name. Obviously 'json' would work, but
>  I am not sure if there is something better. Remember, we want simple
>  so that if someone goes, "I wonder if Python has a JSON module", they
>  can easily find it (which means no crazy package names).
+1 for "json" or "jsonlib". Simple is better.
>
>  We might also act as quality control on the source code to make sure
>  it is up to snuff based on PEP 8.
I'll have a look.
>
>  -Brett
>  _______________________________________________
>  stdlib-sig mailing list
>  stdlib-sig at python.org
>  http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/stdlib-sig
>



-- 
Cheers,
Benjamin Peterson