[stdlib-sig] Proposal: new "interpreter" module

[Benjamin Peterson]

On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 10:01 AM, Steven Bethard <steven.bethard at gmail.com>
wrote:

> On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 11:27 AM, Christian Heimes <christian at cheimes.de>
> wrote:
> >  Once the pyvm module is implemented the sys module should only contain
> >  system methods which can be implemented by all flavors of Python.
>
> On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 5:44 AM, Brett Cannon <brett at python.org> wrote:
> > This is exactly the type of separation I want to see.
> [snip]
> > Sound good to people? If so, who wants to take this on?
>
> 2008/4/4 Benjamin Peterson <musiccomposition at gmail.com>:
> > If there is further support, I will.
>
> I don't know how much more further support you need, but I'm 100%
> behind the idea. If you need any more help, let me know.

I'm starting the PEP now...

>
>
> Steve
> --
> I'm not *in*-sane. Indeed, I am so far *out* of sane that you appear a
> tiny blip on the distant coast of sanity.
>        --- Bucky Katt, Get Fuzzy
>



-- 
Cheers,
Benjamin Peterson
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/stdlib-sig/attachments/20080404/b568022f/attachment.htm