[Speed] option in performance to invoke number of worker preocess

[Pintu Kumar]

By mistake, mail was sent to Victor instead of speed. I was asking if the
benchmark code is specific to intel x86_64. When I am running this tool
(performance) on IBM Power machine, results are kind of promising enough as
multiple runs of this benchmark tool comes up with the same result and
benchmark seems to be stable.

On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 4:52 AM, Victor Stinner <victor.stinner at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hum, you replied to me in private. I don't know if it was deliberate.
>
> 2017-07-26 19:39 GMT+02:00 Pintu Kumar <pintukumar79 at gmail.com>:
> > Thanks Victor. I already tried with --fast and --rigorous option.
> Rigorous
> > spawns twice the number of worker processes. My result was almost same
> for
> > both options --fast as well as --rigorous.
>
> Oh ok, good.
>
> > I will look into third link you
> > have shared. I have one more query. Almost all the time you have
> discussed
> > about running this performance tool on Intel x86_64 architecture, even i
> saw
> > your video about how to tune systems to run benchmarks. I am running this
> > benchmark tool on IBM Power machine running ubuntu O.S. So, should I
> believe
> > the results what I get here on IBM Power machine.
>
> I focused on hardware that I have (access to), so Intel x86-64 CPUs.
> Sorry, I don't know IBM Power, I don't know how power management is
> handled on such CPU. Ask maybe on the speed mailing list?
>
> Victor
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/speed/attachments/20170727/2ac648ba/attachment.html>