From eliswilson at hushmail.com Wed May 1 01:09:53 2013 From: eliswilson at hushmail.com (eliswilson at hushmail.com) Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2013 19:09:53 -0400 Subject: [Spambayes] Biggest Fake Conference in Computer Science Message-ID: <20130430230953.72045E6736@smtp.hushmail.com> Biggest Fake Conference in Computer Science We are researchers from different parts of the world and conducted a study on the world?s biggest bogus computer science conference WORLDCOMP http://sites.google.com/site/worlddump1 organized by Prof. Hamid Arabnia from University of Georgia, USA. We submitted a fake paper to WORLDCOMP 2011 and again (the same paper with a modified title) to WORLDCOMP 2012. This paper had numerous fundamental mistakes. Sample statements from that paper include: (1). Binary logic is fuzzy logic and vice versa (2). Pascal developed fuzzy logic (3). Object oriented languages do not exhibit any polymorphism or inheritance (4). TCP and IP are synonyms and are part of OSI model (5). Distributed systems deal with only one computer (6). Laptop is an example for a super computer (7). Operating system is an example for computer hardware Also, our paper did not express any conceptual meaning. However, it was accepted both the times without any modifications (and without any reviews) and we were invited to submit the final paper and a payment of $500+ fee to present the paper. We decided to use the fee for better purposes than making Prof. Hamid Arabnia richer. After that, we received few reminders from WORLDCOMP to pay the fee but we never responded. This fake paper is different from the two fake papers already published (see https://sites.google.com/site/worlddump4 for details) in WORLDCOMP. We MUST say that you should look at the above website if you have any thoughts of participating in WORLDCOMP. DBLP and other indexing agencies have stopped indexing WORLDCOMP?s proceedings since 2011 due to its fakeness. See http://www.informatik.uni-trier.de/~ley/db/conf/icai/index.html for of one of the conferences of WORLDCOMP and notice that there is no listing after 2010. See Section 2 of http://sites.google.com/site/dumpconf for comments from well-known researchers about WORLDCOMP. The status of your WORLDCOMP papers can be changed from scientific to other (i.e., junk or non-technical) at any time. Better not to have a paper than having it in WORLDCOMP and spoil the resume and peace of mind forever! Our study revealed that WORLDCOMP is money making business, using University of Georgia mask, for Prof. Hamid Arabnia. He is throwing out a small chunk of that money (around 20 dollars per paper published in WORLDCOMP?s proceedings) to his puppet (Mr. Ashu Solo or A.M.G. Solo) who publicizes WORLDCOMP and also defends it at various forums, using fake/anonymous names. The puppet uses fake names and defames other conferences to divert traffic to WORLDCOMP. He also makes anonymous phone calls and threatens the critiques of WORLDCOMP (See Item 7 of Section 5 of above website). That is, the puppet does all his best to get a maximum number of papers published at WORLDCOMP to get more money into his (and Prof. Hamid Arabnia?s) pockets. Prof. Hamid Arabnia makes a lot of tricks. For example, he appeared in a newspaper to fool the public, claiming him a victim of cyber-attack (see Item 8 in Section 5 of above website). Monte Carlo Resort (the venue of WORLDCOMP for more than 10 years, until 2012) has refused to provide the venue for WORLDCOMP?13 because of the fears of their image being tarnished due to WORLDCOMP?s fraudulent activities. That is why WORLDCOMP?13 is taking place at a different resort. WORLDCOMP will not be held after 2013. The draft paper submission deadline is over but still there are no committee members, no reviewers, and there is no conference Chairman. The only contact details available on WORLDCOMP?s website is just an email address! We ask Prof. Hamid Arabnia to publish all reviews for all the papers (after blocking identifiable details) since 2000 conference. Reveal the names and affiliations of all the reviewers (for each year) and how many papers each reviewer had reviewed on average. We also ask him to look at the Open Challenge (Section 6) at https://sites.google.com/site/moneycomp1 and respond if he has any professional values. Sorry for posting to multiple lists. Spreading the word is the only way to stop this bogus conference. Please forward this message to other mailing lists and people. We are shocked with Prof. Hamid Arabnia and his puppet?s activities at http://worldcomp-fake-bogus.blogspot.com Search Google using the keyword worldcomp fake for additional links. From emf at amhran.net Thu May 2 05:21:34 2013 From: emf at amhran.net (E M F) Date: Wed, 01 May 2013 23:21:34 -0400 Subject: [Spambayes] sb_filter.py eats mail when used in postfix content_filter In-Reply-To: <5178AAD3.2040803@amhran.net> References: <517891BA.3070100@amhran.net> <20130425034305.GA9620@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us> <5178AAD3.2040803@amhran.net> Message-ID: <5181DBBE.3020103@amhran.net> On 4/25/2013 12:02 AM, EMF wrote: > On 4/24/2013 11:43 PM, Fred Smith wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 10:15:22PM -0400, EMF wrote: >>> OS: CentOS 6.4 x86_64 >>> Postfix package: postfix-2.6.6-2.2.el6_1.x86_64 >>> Spambayes package: spambayes-1.1-0.2.a6.el6.noarch >>> >>> All right, I've hit a brick wall with my integration of spambayes >>> and postfix. I based my build combining Jonathan St. Andre's >>> instructions at http://spambayes.sourceforge.net/server_side.html, >>> with a few tweaks from the Postfix side in >>> http://www.postfix.org/FILTER_README.html --- mostly because I'm >>> going to extend the logic. >>> >>> I've successfully trained spambayes with about 12,000 each spam and >>> ham, creating a database in /var/spambayes/filter.db. >>> >>> Running a captured message through sb_filter.py from the command >>> line works flawlessly: >>> ----------------------------------------- >>> $ whoami >>> filter >>> $ cat /tmp/msg.7440 | /usr/bin/sb_filter.py -d >>> /var/spambayes/filter.db -f >>> Return-Path: >>> Received: from amhran.net (3wg23q1.amhran.net [192.168.1.160]) >>> by courier.amhran.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFF223E >>> for ; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 21:28:34 -0400 (EDT) >>> From: "EMF" >>> To: "EMF" >>> Subject: Testing >>> X-Spambayes-Classification: ham; 0.17 >>> >>> SB Test >>> $ >>> ----------------------------------------- >>> >>> Here are the lines from postfix's master.cf (which are very >>> straightforward): >>> ----------------------------------------- >>> smtp inet n - n - - smtpd >>> -o content_filter=filter:dummy >>> filter unix - n n - - pipe >>> flags=Rq user=filter >>> argv=/usr/local/bin/spamfilter.sh -f ${sender} -- ${recipient} >>> ----------------------------------------- >>> >>> Spamfilter.sh sends the mail just fine if it consists of this: >>> ----------------------------------------- >>> cat > /tmp/msg.$$ >>> /usr/sbin/sendmail -i $@ < /tmp/msg.$$ >>> ----------------------------------------- >>> but not if it contains this: >>> ----------------------------------------- >>> cat > /tmp/msg.$$ >>> cat /tmp/msg.$$ | /usr/bin/sb_filter.py -d >>> /var/spambayes/filter.db -f > /tmp/new.$$ >>> /usr/sbin/sendmail -i $@ < /tmp/new.$$ >>> ----------------------------------------- >>> >>> In the latter case --- msg.$$ contains the message, but new.$$ is a >>> zero-length file, and thus what comes through on the far end is an >>> empty message. Interestingly, I get this in syslog.log: >>> ----------------------------------------- >>> Apr 24 21:28:35 courier abrt: detected unhandled Python exception in >>> '/usr/bin/sb_filter.py' >>> Apr 24 21:28:35 courier abrt: can't communicate with ABRT daemon, is >>> it running? [Errno 13] Permission denied >>> ----------------------------------------- >>> >>> How can I capture the exception? What's being called by >>> sb_filter.py at the command line that isn't available when run >>> inside the content_filter? >> Well, I'm not intimate with the innards of the spambayes components, >> but if a program behaves differently on commandline than it does >> in its own normal environment, I'd guess there's something different >> about the system environment: PATH, LD_LIBRARY_PATH, etc., etc., >> etc. >> Okay, I caught the exception in sb_filter.py with a traceback: ------------------------------------------------------------ Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/sb_filter_debug.py", line 279, in main() File "/usr/bin/sb_filter_debug.py", line 255, in main h.newdb() File "/usr/bin/sb_filter_debug.py", line 179, in newdb self.open('n') File "/usr/bin/sb_filter_debug.py", line 167, in open self.h = hammie.open(self.dbname, self.usedb, self.mode) File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/spambayes/hammie.py", line 272, in open return Hammie(storage.open_storage(filename, useDB, mode), mode) File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/spambayes/storage.py", line 998, in open_storage return klass(data_source_name, mode) File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/spambayes/storage.py", line 154, in __init__ self.load() File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/spambayes/storage.py", line 180, in load self.dbm = dbmstorage.open(self.db_name, self.mode) File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/spambayes/dbmstorage.py", line 70, in open return f(db_name, mode) File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/spambayes/dbmstorage.py", line 40, in open_best return f(*args) File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/spambayes/dbmstorage.py", line 20, in open_dbhash return bsddb.hashopen(*args) File "/usr/lib64/python2.6/bsddb/__init__.py", line 361, in hashopen d.open(file, db.DB_HASH, flags, mode) DBAccessError: (13, 'Permission denied') ------------------------------------------------------------ So, it's getting a permission denied on the hash database. I added some logic to capture self.dbname, self.usedb, and self.mode --- and I found a difference. When run from the command line, self.mode is "r", but when run as part of the filter, it's set to "n". It's trying to create a new hash database instead of reading the one it's been told to use! After digging back through the code and disabling parts, it's choking on "os.path.exists". For some reason, when run as part of the postfix filter, it believes /var/spambayes/filter.db doesn't exist. As shown in the master.cf lines, there's no chroot involved, so I didn't know why it couldn't find the file. And then, the lightbulb hits, and I proceed to start thumping my head on the table: [root at courier-b tmp] # getenforce Enforcing Curse you, SElinux, curse you. Setting the correct context on the filter.db file resolves the problem. NOTABUG. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From fredex at fcshome.stoneham.ma.us Thu May 2 15:08:16 2013 From: fredex at fcshome.stoneham.ma.us (Fred Smith) Date: Thu, 2 May 2013 09:08:16 -0400 Subject: [Spambayes] sb_filter.py eats mail when used in postfix content_filter In-Reply-To: <5181DBBE.3020103@amhran.net> References: <517891BA.3070100@amhran.net> <20130425034305.GA9620@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us> <5178AAD3.2040803@amhran.net> <5181DBBE.3020103@amhran.net> Message-ID: <20130502130816.GB27169@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us> On Wed, May 01, 2013 at 11:21:34PM -0400, E M F wrote: > On 4/25/2013 12:02 AM, EMF wrote: > >On 4/24/2013 11:43 PM, Fred Smith wrote: > >>On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 10:15:22PM -0400, EMF wrote: > >>>OS: CentOS 6.4 x86_64 > >>>Postfix package: postfix-2.6.6-2.2.el6_1.x86_64 > >>>Spambayes package: spambayes-1.1-0.2.a6.el6.noarch > >>> > >>>All right, I've hit a brick wall with my integration of spambayes > >>>and postfix. I based my build combining Jonathan St. Andre's > >>>instructions at http://spambayes.sourceforge.net/server_side.html, > >>>with a few tweaks from the Postfix side in > >>>http://www.postfix.org/FILTER_README.html --- mostly because I'm > >>>going to extend the logic. > >>> > >>>I've successfully trained spambayes with about 12,000 each spam and > >>>ham, creating a database in /var/spambayes/filter.db. > >>> > >>>Running a captured message through sb_filter.py from the command > >>>line works flawlessly: > >>>----------------------------------------- > >>>$ whoami > >>>filter > >>>$ cat /tmp/msg.7440 | /usr/bin/sb_filter.py -d > >>>/var/spambayes/filter.db -f > >>>Return-Path: > >>>Received: from amhran.net (3wg23q1.amhran.net [192.168.1.160]) > >>> by courier.amhran.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFF223E > >>> for ; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 21:28:34 -0400 (EDT) > >>>From: "EMF" > >>>To: "EMF" > >>>Subject: Testing > >>>X-Spambayes-Classification: ham; 0.17 > >>> > >>>SB Test > >>>$ > >>>----------------------------------------- > >>> > >>>Here are the lines from postfix's master.cf (which are very > >>>straightforward): > >>>----------------------------------------- > >>>smtp inet n - n - - smtpd > >>> -o content_filter=filter:dummy > >>>filter unix - n n - - pipe > >>> flags=Rq user=filter > >>> argv=/usr/local/bin/spamfilter.sh -f ${sender} -- ${recipient} > >>>----------------------------------------- > >>> > >>>Spamfilter.sh sends the mail just fine if it consists of this: > >>>----------------------------------------- > >>> cat > /tmp/msg.$$ > >>> /usr/sbin/sendmail -i $@ < /tmp/msg.$$ > >>>----------------------------------------- > >>>but not if it contains this: > >>>----------------------------------------- > >>> cat > /tmp/msg.$$ > >>> cat /tmp/msg.$$ | /usr/bin/sb_filter.py -d > >>>/var/spambayes/filter.db -f > /tmp/new.$$ > >>> /usr/sbin/sendmail -i $@ < /tmp/new.$$ > >>>----------------------------------------- > >>> > >>>In the latter case --- msg.$$ contains the message, but new.$$ is a > >>>zero-length file, and thus what comes through on the far end is an > >>>empty message. Interestingly, I get this in syslog.log: > >>>----------------------------------------- > >>>Apr 24 21:28:35 courier abrt: detected unhandled Python exception in > >>>'/usr/bin/sb_filter.py' > >>>Apr 24 21:28:35 courier abrt: can't communicate with ABRT daemon, is > >>>it running? [Errno 13] Permission denied > >>>----------------------------------------- > >>> > >>>How can I capture the exception? What's being called by > >>>sb_filter.py at the command line that isn't available when run > >>>inside the content_filter? > >>Well, I'm not intimate with the innards of the spambayes components, > >>but if a program behaves differently on commandline than it does > >>in its own normal environment, I'd guess there's something different > >>about the system environment: PATH, LD_LIBRARY_PATH, etc., etc., > >>etc. > >> > Okay, I caught the exception in sb_filter.py with a traceback: > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "/usr/bin/sb_filter_debug.py", line 279, in > main() > File "/usr/bin/sb_filter_debug.py", line 255, in main > h.newdb() > File "/usr/bin/sb_filter_debug.py", line 179, in newdb > self.open('n') > File "/usr/bin/sb_filter_debug.py", line 167, in open > self.h = hammie.open(self.dbname, self.usedb, self.mode) > File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/spambayes/hammie.py", line 272, in open > return Hammie(storage.open_storage(filename, useDB, mode), mode) > File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/spambayes/storage.py", line 998, in open_storage > return klass(data_source_name, mode) > File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/spambayes/storage.py", line 154, in __init__ > self.load() > File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/spambayes/storage.py", line 180, in load > self.dbm = dbmstorage.open(self.db_name, self.mode) > File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/spambayes/dbmstorage.py", line 70, in open > return f(db_name, mode) > File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/spambayes/dbmstorage.py", line 40, in open_best > return f(*args) > File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/spambayes/dbmstorage.py", line 20, in open_dbhash > return bsddb.hashopen(*args) > File "/usr/lib64/python2.6/bsddb/__init__.py", line 361, in hashopen > d.open(file, db.DB_HASH, flags, mode) > DBAccessError: (13, 'Permission denied') > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > So, it's getting a permission denied on the hash database. I added some logic to capture self.dbname, self.usedb, and self.mode --- and I found a difference. When run from the command line, self.mode is "r", but when run as part of the filter, it's set to "n". It's trying to create a new hash database instead of reading the one it's been told to use! > > After digging back through the code and disabling parts, it's choking on "os.path.exists". For some reason, when run as part of the postfix filter, it believes /var/spambayes/filter.db doesn't exist. As shown in the master.cf lines, there's no chroot involved, so I didn't know why it couldn't find the file. > > And then, the lightbulb hits, and I proceed to start thumping my head on the table: > [root at courier-b tmp] # getenforce > Enforcing > > Curse you, SElinux, curse you. Setting the correct context on the filter.db file resolves the problem. > > NOTABUG. > Good troubleshooting! It's unfortunate that SpamBayes won't fail gracefully, i.e., make sure the mail gets delivered even if the filter fails. Fred -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- .---- Fred Smith / ( /__ ,__. __ __ / __ : / / / / /__) / / /__) .+' Home: fredex at fcshome.stoneham.ma.us / / (__ (___ (__(_ (___ / :__ 781-438-5471 -------------------------------- Jude 1:24,25 --------------------------------- From burnette at appleseed.org Tue May 14 16:10:23 2013 From: burnette at appleseed.org (Diane Burnette) Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 10:10:23 -0400 Subject: [Spambayes] Problem with outlook Message-ID: <6507F4369FF99C43B3CC49418E26E86997FCB6@chamber-dc1.NCMCC2k.local> A new download has been installed on a Windows 7 machine using Outlook 2007 - accessing the network mail server through a VPN. When Outlook is launched, an error message appears saying Spambayes is not installed and suggests restarting Outlook. The Spambayes toolbar is displaying on Outlook, but does not operate. I tried reinstalling Spambayes. It still does not work. What do you suggest? Please reply to mckeehan at massweb.org. Thank you, David McKeehan Diane Diane Burnette Director The Johnny Appleseed Visitor Center Rte 2 Westbound Between exits 34&35 in Lancaster, Ma 01523 Appleseed Country Guide Appleseed Country Fair www.appleseed.org 860 South Street,Fitchburg, MA 01420 (978) 534-2829 (978) 534-2436 Fax Find us on Facebook ! -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 1110 bytes Desc: image002.jpg URL: From jmeggers at alycera.com Tue May 14 16:51:04 2013 From: jmeggers at alycera.com (John Meggers) Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 09:51:04 -0500 Subject: [Spambayes] Outlook 2013 Add-In Running Great Message-ID: <002e01ce50b2$76006060$62012120$@alycera.com> Just a note to report that SpamBayes Outlook Addin Version 1.1b2 is running flawlessly on my new laptop with Windows 7 (64 bit) and MS Outlook 2013. Also no problem co-existing with Norton Internet Security. Thanks for a great tool! John Meggers -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From gwen at nativeappraisals.com Mon May 20 23:21:08 2013 From: gwen at nativeappraisals.com (gwen at nativeappraisals.com) Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 17:21:08 -0400 Subject: [Spambayes] assistance please Message-ID: <125BEB3DD0584CE0B9407FF3B4095EB8@GwenPC> Hello and thank you for your time! I successfully loaded the free SpamBayes on my Windows 7, Outlook laptop. I am unable to complete this download for some reason, on my 2nd computer; a desktop. The desktop (2nd computer) is Windows XP, Outlook Express. I configured all, but it reports that it shows "none". Attached is a copy of the information I loaded into the program. Any assistance is appreciated. I just uninstalled Cloudmark after a month, as it was very unstable and only worked part time. I'm drowning in spam. I appreciate your assistance! Thank you, Gwen Gwen Yeaman, ASA Native Appraisals. LLC. Accredited Senior Appraiser American Society of Appraisers Appraisers of: Fine Native American Collections, North American Materials, American Indian Art www.NativeAppraisals.com Gwen at NativeAppraisals.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: SpamBayes Web Interface info.doc Type: application/msword Size: 179200 bytes Desc: not available URL: From lynnpd1 at gmail.com Tue May 21 17:32:10 2013 From: lynnpd1 at gmail.com (lynnpd1 at gmail.com) Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 08:32:10 -0700 Subject: [Spambayes] Spambayes not from Trusted site Message-ID: <000901ce5638$5d726b20$18574160$@com> I have spent the last two hours reading over your site to try and find out why Spambayes has stopped working in Outlook 2007. I have used it for years and love it, but today when I booted my computer, it no longer works in Outlook. First, I am on a Windows 7 PC using Outlook 2007. I uninstalled the program and reinstalled it but Windows refuses to recognize the program. When I go to the Trust Center/Add-ins to check that it is from a trusted source, I get the following message: "Load behavior: Not loaded. Certificate of signed and load at startup COM Add-Ins is not in trusted source list." I have tried to fix this as administrator, but can't seem to figure out where to tell Windows it's an OK program. I have reinstalled it several times and rebooted my computer. I'm at a loss and hope you can help. Thanks. Sincerely, Lynn Dougherty -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From dale at BriannasSaladDressing.com Tue May 21 19:01:05 2013 From: dale at BriannasSaladDressing.com (Dale Schroeder) Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 12:01:05 -0500 Subject: [Spambayes] assistance please In-Reply-To: <125BEB3DD0584CE0B9407FF3B4095EB8@GwenPC> References: <125BEB3DD0584CE0B9407FF3B4095EB8@GwenPC> Message-ID: <519BA851.2040202@BriannasSaladDressing.com> Gwen, I admit that I don't fully understand the explanation of your problem, but I can tell you that when using Outlook Express, you will have to enable some of the "Header Options". Read the explanation for those options to see if they are what you need. If that doesn't fix the problem, please post more details of what is not working. Dale On 05/20/2013 4:21 PM, gwen at nativeappraisals.com wrote: > Hello and thank you for your time! > I successfully loaded the free SpamBayes on my Windows 7, Outlook > laptop. I am unable to complete this download for some reason, on my > 2nd computer; a desktop. > The desktop (2nd computer) is Windows XP, Outlook Express. I > configured all, but it reports that it shows "none". Attached is a > copy of the information I loaded into the program. > Any assistance is appreciated. I just uninstalled Cloudmark after a > month, as it was very unstable and only worked part time. I'm drowning > in spam. I appreciate your assistance! > Thank you, > Gwen > Gwen Yeaman, ASA > Native Appraisals. LLC. > Accredited Senior Appraiser > American Society of Appraisers > Appraisers of: > Fine Native American Collections, > North American Materials, > American Indian Art > www.NativeAppraisals.com > Gwen at NativeAppraisals.com > > > _______________________________________________ > SpamBayes at python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/spambayes > Info/Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/spambayes > Check the FAQ before asking: http://spambayes.sf.net/faq.html -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From skip at pobox.com Tue May 21 19:45:27 2013 From: skip at pobox.com (Skip Montanaro) Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 12:45:27 -0500 Subject: [Spambayes] assistance please In-Reply-To: <519BA851.2040202@BriannasSaladDressing.com> References: <125BEB3DD0584CE0B9407FF3B4095EB8@GwenPC> <519BA851.2040202@BriannasSaladDressing.com> Message-ID: Also, Outlook != Outlook Express. If you've never set up SpamBayes for Outlook Express, have a look at the SpamBayes FAQ for direction. Skip From lynnpd1 at gmail.com Tue May 21 20:00:44 2013 From: lynnpd1 at gmail.com (lynnpd1 at gmail.com) Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 11:00:44 -0700 Subject: [Spambayes] Spambayes is listed in Outlook as not a trusted source Message-ID: <005401ce564d$1e3b0ce0$5ab126a0$@com> I have spent the last two hours reading over your site to try and find out why Spambayes has stopped working in Outlook 2007. I have used it for years and love it, but today when I booted my computer, it no longer works in Outlook. First, I am on a Windows 7 PC using Outlook 2007. I uninstalled the program and reinstalled it but Windows refuses to recognize the program as trusted. When I go to the Trust Center/Add-ins to check that it is from a trusted source, I get the following message: "Load behavior: Not loaded. Certificate of signed and load at startup COM Add-Ins is not in trusted source list." I have tried to fix this as administrator, but can't seem to figure out where to tell Windows it's an OK program. I have reinstalled it several times and rebooted my computer. I'm at a loss and hope you can help. Thanks. Sincerely, Lynn Dougherty -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: