From russ.koyle at hp.com Tue Nov 2 17:09:04 2010 From: russ.koyle at hp.com (Koyle, Russ ((Manpower MS))) Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2010 16:09:04 +0000 Subject: [Spambayes] Thank you very much Message-ID: <194B8BFEA1B72D45B3EE8FCBBB327F2D6FBE532182@GVW0442EXB.americas.hpqcorp.net> I've been using Spambayes for as long as I can remember (not to long) but when I checked for an update it looks like the project is mostly dead. Just wanted to say Thank you. This is such a good product, and it works unbelievable well. Thanks for your time, and thanks for Spambayes. I have forgotten how miserable life was before Spambayes. Hope someone benefits from this. Thanks, Russ Koyle -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From amedee at vangasse.eu Wed Nov 3 23:42:26 2010 From: amedee at vangasse.eu (Amedee Van Gasse) Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2010 23:42:26 +0100 Subject: [Spambayes] Thank you very much In-Reply-To: <194B8BFEA1B72D45B3EE8FCBBB327F2D6FBE532182@GVW0442EXB.americas.hpqcorp.net> References: <194B8BFEA1B72D45B3EE8FCBBB327F2D6FBE532182@GVW0442EXB.americas.hpqcorp.net> Message-ID: <4CD1E552.7020805@vangasse.eu> Op 02-11-10 17:09, Koyle, Russ ((Manpower MS)) schreef: > I?ve been using Spambayes for as long as I can remember (not to long) > but when I checked for an update it looks like the project is mostly > dead. Spambayes is not dead as far as I know. Just because you don't see a new version every month doesn't mean that it's dead. All major bugs seem to have been ironed out and it "just works". Why change and possibly break anything? > Just wanted to say Thank you. This is such a good product, and it > works unbelievable well. > > Thanks for your time, and thanks for Spambayes. I have forgotten how > miserable life was before Spambayes. > > Hope someone benefits from this. > > Thanks, > > Russ Koyle I want to take the occasion to thank the devs too. -- Amedee From skip at pobox.com Thu Nov 4 03:15:11 2010 From: skip at pobox.com (skip at pobox.com) Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2010 21:15:11 -0500 Subject: [Spambayes] Thank you very much In-Reply-To: <4CD1E552.7020805@vangasse.eu> References: <194B8BFEA1B72D45B3EE8FCBBB327F2D6FBE532182@GVW0442EXB.americas.hpqcorp.net> <4CD1E552.7020805@vangasse.eu> Message-ID: <19666.5935.376710.393450@montanaro.dyndns.org> Amedee> Op 02-11-10 17:09, Koyle, Russ ((Manpower MS)) schreef: >> I?ve been using Spambayes for as long as I can remember (not to long) >> but when I checked for an update it looks like the project is mostly >> dead. Amedee> Spambayes is not dead as far as I know. Just because you don't Amedee> see a new version every month doesn't mean that it's dead. All Amedee> major bugs seem to have been ironed out and it "just works". Why Amedee> change and possibly break anything? Also, as the currently only every-now-and-then-active developer, I don't use Windows. That's where most users experience problems, so I'm unable to help resolve them. -- Skip Montanaro - skip at pobox.com - http://www.smontanaro.net/ From info at camera-obscuraonline.co.uk Mon Nov 8 12:29:07 2010 From: info at camera-obscuraonline.co.uk (David Pendry) Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2010 11:29:07 -0000 Subject: [Spambayes] Hope this is the right address! Message-ID: Good morning. Having a little bit of trouble with my Spam Bays. The "Not Spam" tab has disappeared (again), so it's incredibly difficult to train incoming emails. For instance, my sister has, for some unknown reason, suddenly become a very heavy spammer (according to what's going on) My best suppliers have gone from prime-cuts to luncheon-meat in one fell swoop, and a new contact has now gone much the same way! How do I get my "Not Spam" tab back? It disappeared once before, but reappeared again some months later (no thanks to me, I hasten to add!) Any ideas? If you reply, I have little doubt it will end up in the Junk folder, so I shall keep my eyes peeled. Regards, David. David C. Pendry Camera Obscura Tel: 01256-769714 Mail: info at camera-obscuraonline.co.uk Web: http://www.camera-obscuraonline.co.uk -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Simek at ids-praha.cz Wed Nov 10 11:51:32 2010 From: Simek at ids-praha.cz (=?iso-8859-2?Q?=A9imek_Petr?=) Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 11:51:32 +0100 Subject: [Spambayes] SpamBayes error Message-ID: Hi, I have install new Office 2010 and I found, that SpamBayes does not work. I have Windows XP SP3 CZ, Outlook 2010 Prof CZ, SpamBayes 1.1a6. When I start Outlook 2010, there is: Have you any solution of this ?? Tahnk You for your answer Ing. Petr ?imek Na Mor?ni 3/360 128 00 PRAHA 2 tel.: 236 083 267 e-mail: simek at ids-praha.cz mobil: 607 664 020 http://www.ids-praha.cz -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image003.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 12860 bytes Desc: image003.jpg URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image004.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 9351 bytes Desc: image004.jpg URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image005.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 1966 bytes Desc: image005.jpg URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image006.png Type: image/png Size: 164 bytes Desc: image006.png URL: From hhunter at thechurchatargyle.org Fri Nov 12 17:08:51 2010 From: hhunter at thechurchatargyle.org (Hal Hunter) Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 11:08:51 -0500 Subject: [Spambayes] Failure report Message-ID: <023901cb8283$e60b2d90$b22188b0$@org> Windows XP, SP3 Build 2600 Processor 2.30 gigahertz AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core Outlook version 12.0.6539.5000 SpamBayes will not display spam clues for current message. No error displayed and no other symptom of malfunction. Have stopped and restarted Outlook. Have uninstalled and reinstalled SpamBayes from fresh download. Rev. Hal Hunter Ministry Pastor & Administrator The Church at Argyle 6823 Argyle Forest Blvd Jacksonville FL 32244 904-777-1238 (voice) 904-779-1845 (fax) www.thechurchatargyle.org www.argylestuf.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: spambayes1.log Type: application/octet-stream Size: 11776 bytes Desc: not available URL: From dsfurbush at earthlink.net Fri Nov 12 17:45:37 2010 From: dsfurbush at earthlink.net (dsfurbush) Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 11:45:37 -0500 Subject: [Spambayes] Spambyes stopped working Message-ID: <000001cb8289$0879edd0$196dc970$@net> I use WindowXP service pack 3, Outlook 2007 SP2. Spambyes has worked correctly for some years, now it has stopped filtering spam, there is no "Recover from Spam" button any more, when you click on Delete as Spam button, nothing happens. I have uninstalled and reinstalled product v1.0.4 with same results. Pls advise. Thank you. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From leslie at pratchco.com Sun Nov 14 18:10:16 2010 From: leslie at pratchco.com (Leslie Pratch) Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2010 11:10:16 -0600 Subject: [Spambayes] Installing spam bayes Message-ID: <004001cb841e$d04aa7f0$70dff7d0$@com> I have two identical laptops, both using Word professional 7, I installed 32 bit spambayes, the stable version 1.0.4 or something like that, it installed just fine on one laptop but is not visible in outlook on the other. Can you help? I didn't install the 64 bit and I also tried installing the python software too. Best Regards, Leslie Pratch (312) 464-7919 444 N. Michigan Ave. Suite 1910 Chicago, IL 60611 www.pratchco.com Notice To Recipient: This e-mail is meant for only the intended recipient of the transmission, and may be a communication privileged by law. If you received this e-mail in error, any review, use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. Please notify us immediately of the error by return e-mail and please delete this message and any and all duplicates of this message from your system. Thank you in advance for your cooperation. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From narissa.hill at gmail.com Mon Nov 15 05:34:33 2010 From: narissa.hill at gmail.com (Narissa Hill) Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2010 21:34:33 -0700 Subject: [Spambayes] Outlook 2010 Message-ID: <009a01cb847e$68d84220$3a88c660$@gmail.com> Any idea when spambayes 2010 will be released? I've tried others and I'd rather have nothing than those. What a fabulous fabulous product! -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From amedee at vangasse.eu Mon Nov 15 07:52:00 2010 From: amedee at vangasse.eu (Amedee Van Gasse) Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 07:52:00 +0100 Subject: [Spambayes] Outlook 2010 In-Reply-To: <009a01cb847e$68d84220$3a88c660$@gmail.com> References: <009a01cb847e$68d84220$3a88c660$@gmail.com> Message-ID: <4CE0D890.1050008@vangasse.eu> Op 15-11-10 05:34, Narissa Hill schreef: > Any idea when spambayes 2010 will be released? I?ve tried others and I?d > rather have nothing than those. What a fabulous fabulous product! I have tried the current version of SpamBayes, and it works in Office 2010. So you don't need a "SpamBayes 2010". (32 bit Windows 7) From amedee at vangasse.eu Mon Nov 15 07:50:35 2010 From: amedee at vangasse.eu (Amedee Van Gasse) Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 07:50:35 +0100 Subject: [Spambayes] Installing spam bayes In-Reply-To: <004001cb841e$d04aa7f0$70dff7d0$@com> References: <004001cb841e$d04aa7f0$70dff7d0$@com> Message-ID: <4CE0D83B.1010800@vangasse.eu> Op 14-11-10 18:10, Leslie Pratch schreef: > I have two identical laptops, both using Word professional 7, I > installed 32 bit spambayes, the stable version 1.0.4 or something like > that, it installed just fine on one laptop but is not visible in outlook > on the other. Can you help? I didn?t install the 64 bit and I also tried > installing the python software too. You do not need to install Python, except if you are going to develop SpamBayes (or other programming in the Python language) From amedee at vangasse.eu Mon Nov 15 20:15:06 2010 From: amedee at vangasse.eu (Amedee Van Gasse) Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 20:15:06 +0100 (CET) Subject: [Spambayes] Installing spam bayes In-Reply-To: <001c01cb8493$38b1b3a0$aa151ae0$@com> References: <004001cb841e$d04aa7f0$70dff7d0$@com> <4CE0D83B.1010800@vangasse.eu> <001c01cb8493$38b1b3a0$aa151ae0$@com> Message-ID: <20dccae2f9f233882808537a7196fa9e.squirrel@amedee.be> On Mon, November 15, 2010 08:03, Ocean wrote: > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: spambayes-bounces+ocean=cobaltnight.com at python.org > [mailto:spambayes- >> bounces+ocean=cobaltnight.com at python.org] On Behalf Of Amedee Van Gasse >> Sent: Monday, November 15, 2010 1:51 AM >> To: spambayes at python.org >> Subject: Re: [Spambayes] Installing spam bayes >> >> Op 14-11-10 18:10, Leslie Pratch schreef: >> > I have two identical laptops, both using Word professional 7, I >> > installed 32 bit spambayes, the stable version 1.0.4 or something like >> > that, it installed just fine on one laptop but is not visible in >> outlook >> > on the other. Can you help? I didn't install the 64 bit and I also >> tried >> > installing the python software too. >> >> You do not need to install Python, except if you are going to develop >> SpamBayes (or other programming in the Python language) >> > > > Not exactly correct. You need to install Python if you choose to > run from source. > > Running from source is practically the same as developing, to all intents and purposes. Normal users should never have to run from source. (Except if they are on Gentoo, but that is outside the scope of this ML) -- From Ocean at cobaltnight.com Mon Nov 15 20:20:37 2010 From: Ocean at cobaltnight.com (Ocean) Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 14:20:37 -0500 Subject: [Spambayes] Installing spam bayes In-Reply-To: <20dccae2f9f233882808537a7196fa9e.squirrel@amedee.be> References: <004001cb841e$d04aa7f0$70dff7d0$@com> <4CE0D83B.1010800@vangasse.eu> <001c01cb8493$38b1b3a0$aa151ae0$@com> <20dccae2f9f233882808537a7196fa9e.squirrel@amedee.be> Message-ID: <000901cb84fa$36683300$a3389900$@com> > -----Original Message----- > From: spambayes-bounces+ocean=cobaltnight.com at python.org [mailto:spambayes- > bounces+ocean=cobaltnight.com at python.org] On Behalf Of Amedee Van Gasse > Sent: Monday, November 15, 2010 2:15 PM > To: spambayes at python.org > Subject: Re: [Spambayes] Installing spam bayes > > >> > >> You do not need to install Python, except if you are going to develop > >> SpamBayes (or other programming in the Python language) > >> > > > > > > Not exactly correct. You need to install Python if you choose to > > run from source. > > > > > Running from source is practically the same as developing, to all intents > and purposes. Normal users should never have to run from source. (Except > if they are on Gentoo, but that is outside the scope of this ML) > Not true. Over the life of Spambayes, it was not uncommon for there to be no Windows installer for the latest beta. If you wanted to run the latest version, you had to run it from source. That has nothing to do with developing, that's just doing what's necessary to run the latest version. From rking at preflightventures.com Tue Nov 16 17:12:12 2010 From: rking at preflightventures.com (Rick King) Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 11:12:12 -0500 Subject: [Spambayes] help on error in Review Message-ID: An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From skip at pobox.com Tue Nov 16 20:04:04 2010 From: skip at pobox.com (skip at pobox.com) Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 13:04:04 -0600 Subject: [Spambayes] help on error in Review In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <19682.54692.191159.592254@montanaro.dyndns.org> >>>>> "Rick" == Rick King writes: ... DBRunRecoveryError: (-30982, 'DB_RUNRECOVERY: Fatal error, run database recovery -- fatal region error detected; run recovery') Your training database has become corrupted. I'm afraid there's nothing to do other than delete it and retrain from scratch. -- Skip Montanaro - skip at pobox.com - http://www.smontanaro.net/ From amedee at vangasse.eu Wed Nov 17 09:44:21 2010 From: amedee at vangasse.eu (Amedee Van Gasse) Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 09:44:21 +0100 (CET) Subject: [Spambayes] Installing spam bayes In-Reply-To: <000901cb84fa$36683300$a3389900$@com> References: <004001cb841e$d04aa7f0$70dff7d0$@com> <4CE0D83B.1010800@vangasse.eu> <001c01cb8493$38b1b3a0$aa151ae0$@com> <20dccae2f9f233882808537a7196fa9e.squirrel@amedee.be> <000901cb84fa$36683300$a3389900$@com> Message-ID: On Mon, November 15, 2010 20:20, Ocean wrote: > Not true. Over the life of Spambayes, it was not uncommon for there > to be no Windows installer for the latest beta. If you wanted to run the > latest version, you had to run it from source. That has nothing to do > with > developing, that's just doing what's necessary to run the latest version. You said it yourself: this is a thing of the past. It's not needed any more. There is a Windows installer for the latest beta. From Ocean at cobaltnight.com Wed Nov 17 15:58:08 2010 From: Ocean at cobaltnight.com (Ocean) Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 09:58:08 -0500 Subject: [Spambayes] Installing spam bayes In-Reply-To: References: <004001cb841e$d04aa7f0$70dff7d0$@com> <4CE0D83B.1010800@vangasse.eu> <001c01cb8493$38b1b3a0$aa151ae0$@com> <20dccae2f9f233882808537a7196fa9e.squirrel@amedee.be> <000901cb84fa$36683300$a3389900$@com> Message-ID: <001b01cb8667$e7bae5d0$b730b170$@com> > -----Original Message----- > From: spambayes-bounces+ocean=cobaltnight.com at python.org [mailto:spambayes- > bounces+ocean=cobaltnight.com at python.org] On Behalf Of Amedee Van Gasse > Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2010 3:44 AM > To: spambayes at python.org > Subject: Re: [Spambayes] Installing spam bayes > > On Mon, November 15, 2010 20:20, Ocean wrote: > > > Not true. Over the life of Spambayes, it was not uncommon for there > > to be no Windows installer for the latest beta. If you wanted to run the > > latest version, you had to run it from source. That has nothing to do > > with > > developing, that's just doing what's necessary to run the latest version. > > You said it yourself: this is a thing of the past. It's not needed any > more. There is a Windows installer for the latest beta. > No, that's not what I was saying. While there might be an installer for the latest beta right now, that doesn't mean it will be the case in the future. There was a reason to run from code in the past that had nothing to do with development, and that same reason could be just as valid in the future as well. From skip at pobox.com Wed Nov 17 16:22:16 2010 From: skip at pobox.com (skip at pobox.com) Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 09:22:16 -0600 Subject: [Spambayes] Installing spam bayes In-Reply-To: <001b01cb8667$e7bae5d0$b730b170$@com> References: <004001cb841e$d04aa7f0$70dff7d0$@com> <4CE0D83B.1010800@vangasse.eu> <001c01cb8493$38b1b3a0$aa151ae0$@com> <20dccae2f9f233882808537a7196fa9e.squirrel@amedee.be> <000901cb84fa$36683300$a3389900$@com> <001b01cb8667$e7bae5d0$b730b170$@com> Message-ID: <19683.62248.21615.748508@montanaro.dyndns.org> Ocean> No, that's not what I was saying. While there might be an Ocean> installer for the latest beta right now, that doesn't mean it Ocean> will be the case in the future. There was a reason to run from Ocean> code in the past that had nothing to do with development, and Ocean> that same reason could be just as valid in the future as well. Are you volunteering to create Windows installers for SpamBayes in the future? -- Skip Montanaro - skip at pobox.com - http://www.smontanaro.net/ From Ocean at cobaltnight.com Wed Nov 17 16:38:15 2010 From: Ocean at cobaltnight.com (Ocean) Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 10:38:15 -0500 Subject: [Spambayes] Installing spam bayes In-Reply-To: <19683.62248.21615.748508@montanaro.dyndns.org> References: <004001cb841e$d04aa7f0$70dff7d0$@com> <4CE0D83B.1010800@vangasse.eu> <001c01cb8493$38b1b3a0$aa151ae0$@com> <20dccae2f9f233882808537a7196fa9e.squirrel@amedee.be> <000901cb84fa$36683300$a3389900$@com> <001b01cb8667$e7bae5d0$b730b170$@com> <19683.62248.21615.748508@montanaro.dyndns.org> Message-ID: <001c01cb866d$7362e790$5a28b6b0$@com> > -----Original Message----- > From: skip at pobox.com [mailto:skip at pobox.com] > Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2010 10:22 AM > To: Ocean > Cc: spambayes at python.org > Subject: Re: [Spambayes] Installing spam bayes > > > Ocean> No, that's not what I was saying. While there might be an > Ocean> installer for the latest beta right now, that doesn't mean it > Ocean> will be the case in the future. There was a reason to run from > Ocean> code in the past that had nothing to do with development, and > Ocean> that same reason could be just as valid in the future as well. > > Are you volunteering to create Windows installers for SpamBayes in the > future? > No, I'm simply pointing out that running the latest version often meant running from code, and can in the future as well. You don't need to be a developer in order to have a legitimate reason to run from code. From glako at sojasau.de Wed Nov 17 20:41:39 2010 From: glako at sojasau.de (glako at sojasau.de) Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 20:41:39 +0100 Subject: [Spambayes] Python 3 Message-ID: <20101117194117.GA6599@nikita> Hi, I'm an Arch-Linux User and (try to) maintain the Spambayes AUR-Package. Now Python3 is the default in Arch-Linux and there are some changes. One of these is here described: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=1568 So, are there any considerations to get Spambayes ready for Python3? -- Greetz Michael Key: D273CD27 FP: 16E6 F8E8 A76D DDD4 C3AC FDFF 401D ED72 D273 CD27 -- -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 490 bytes Desc: not available URL: From skip at pobox.com Wed Nov 17 21:11:59 2010 From: skip at pobox.com (skip at pobox.com) Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 14:11:59 -0600 Subject: [Spambayes] Python 3 In-Reply-To: <20101117194117.GA6599@nikita> References: <20101117194117.GA6599@nikita> Message-ID: <19684.14095.845158.429925@montanaro.dyndns.org> Michael> So, are there any considerations to get Spambayes ready for Python3? I don't have the time. Do you have patches other than just to convert print statements into function calls? I'd be real surprised if that was all that was necessary. -- Skip Montanaro - skip at pobox.com - http://www.smontanaro.net/ From johabba at yahoo.com Sat Nov 27 01:33:36 2010 From: johabba at yahoo.com (johaBBa) Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2010 16:33:36 -0800 (PST) Subject: [Spambayes] Unable to create hammie.db. All sb_*.py give same error Message-ID: <807771.47445.qm@web120105.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> I'm moving my email server from a x86 system to a x86_64 system with better specs. I installed latest spambayes from source with no errors. When I try to create the initial hammie.db, I get the traceback below. All /usr/bin/sb_*.py scripts give the same error on the x86_64 system. I removed the ~/.hammie.db on my old x86 system; creating a new db on that system still works. Both x86 and x86_64 systems are fully updated. On the old x86 system I used spambayes-1.1a4. I installed spambayes-1.1a4 in the x86_64 system and I get the same error below. Any assistance getting spambayes working on the x86_64 system would be greatly appreciated. OS: CentOS 5.5 x86_64 Version: spambayes-1.1a6 Python: 2.4.3 (#1, Nov 11 2010, 13:30:19) Traceback [user at host ~]$ /usr/bin/sb_filter.py -d /home/user/.hammie.db -n Traceback (most recent call last): ? File "/usr/bin/sb_filter.py", line 83, in ? ??? from spambayes import hammie, Options, mboxutils, storage ? File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/spambayes-1.1a6-py2.4.egg/spambayes/hammie.py", line 6, in ? ??? from spambayes import storage ? File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/spambayes-1.1a6-py2.4.egg/spambayes/storage.py", line 62, in ? ??? from spambayes import classifier ? File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/spambayes-1.1a6-py2.4.egg/spambayes/classifier.py", line 60, in ? ??? from spambayes.safepickle import pickle_read, pickle_write ? File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/spambayes-1.1a6-py2.4.egg/spambayes/safepickle.py", line 7, in ? ??? import lockfile ? File "build/bdist.linux-x86_64/egg/lockfile/__init__.py", line 279, in ? ? File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/lockfile-0.9.1-py2.4.egg/lockfile/linklockfile.py", line 6 ??? from . import (LockBase, LockFailed, NotLocked, NotMyLock, LockTimeout, ???????? ^ SyntaxError: invalid syntax -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From skip at pobox.com Sat Nov 27 04:02:51 2010 From: skip at pobox.com (skip at pobox.com) Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2010 21:02:51 -0600 Subject: [Spambayes] Unable to create hammie.db. All sb_*.py give same error In-Reply-To: <807771.47445.qm@web120105.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> References: <807771.47445.qm@web120105.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <19696.29915.904138.825670@montanaro.dyndns.org> johabba> OS: CentOS 5.5 x86_64 johabba> Version: spambayes-1.1a6 johabba> Python: 2.4.3 (#1, Nov 11 2010, 13:30:19) ... johabba> ? File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/lockfile-0.9.1-py2.4.egg/lockfile/linklockfile.py", line 6 johabba> ??? from . import (LockBase, LockFailed, NotLocked, NotMyLock, LockTimeout, johabba> ???????? ^ johabba> SyntaxError: invalid syntax Revert to lockfile 0.8 or upgrade your Python installation. Skip From ari_sternberg at hotmail.com Mon Nov 29 14:26:13 2010 From: ari_sternberg at hotmail.com (Ari Sternberg) Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 08:26:13 -0500 Subject: [Spambayes] delete as spam Message-ID: Good morning The ?Delete as Spam? button stopped working Outlook 2007, windows XP the button is there, but does not function. i read the FAQ :) Can you help Thank you Ari -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From johabba at yahoo.com Mon Nov 29 16:09:26 2010 From: johabba at yahoo.com (johaBBa) Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 07:09:26 -0800 (PST) Subject: [Spambayes] Unable to create hammie.db. All sb_*.py give same error In-Reply-To: <19696.29915.904138.825670@montanaro.dyndns.org> Message-ID: <827072.79339.qm@web120119.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> Reverting to lockfile-0.8 and/or upgrading python on CentOS was a little too messy for me. Not a real solution, but I found spambayes-1.0.4 in the EPEL repo. This allowed me to create a new ~/.hammie.db. I'm still curious why my (almost) identical x86 CentOS system does not have this issue. Both have the same version of packages; one is just x86 an the other x86_64. I guess that makes all the difference. Thanks for your help and for spambayes! --- On Fri, 26/11/10, skip at pobox.com wrote: From: skip at pobox.com Subject: Re: [Spambayes] Unable to create hammie.db. All sb_*.py give same error To: "johaBBa" Cc: spambayes at python.org Date: Friday, 26 November, 2010, 10:02 PM ? ? johabba> OS: CentOS 5.5 x86_64 ? ? johabba> Version: spambayes-1.1a6 ? ? johabba> Python: 2.4.3 (#1, Nov 11 2010, 13:30:19) ? ? ... ? ? johabba> ? File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/lockfile-0.9.1-py2.4.egg/lockfile/linklockfile.py", line 6 ? ? johabba> ??? from . import (LockBase, LockFailed, NotLocked, NotMyLock, LockTimeout, ? ? johabba> ???????? ^ ? ? johabba> SyntaxError: invalid syntax Revert to lockfile 0.8 or upgrade your Python installation. Skip -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From stuart at CEDCS.com Tue Nov 30 17:36:34 2010 From: stuart at CEDCS.com (Stuart Ord) Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 16:36:34 -0000 Subject: [Spambayes] Can spambayes reject a message back to its sender? Message-ID: <09F2161AFFBF412BA255DAE74F40C4D1@StuartsA10> Hi, I've been using spambayes for a couple of years to really good effect with Outlook 2003. Yesterday I accidentally clicked "spam" on a message that wasn't spam. Today that person has told me his messages to be are returned "you do not have permission to sent to this recipient". All other mail is coming as normal. * Can I reverse this classification? * Does everyone on the spam list get a refusal to deliver messages? I thought the messages just went into the spam folder. Thanks Stuart Ord -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From skip at pobox.com Tue Nov 30 19:09:15 2010 From: skip at pobox.com (skip at pobox.com) Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 12:09:15 -0600 Subject: [Spambayes] Can spambayes reject a message back to its sender? In-Reply-To: <09F2161AFFBF412BA255DAE74F40C4D1@StuartsA10> References: <09F2161AFFBF412BA255DAE74F40C4D1@StuartsA10> Message-ID: <19701.15819.374081.113992@montanaro.dyndns.org> Stuart> I've been using spambayes for a couple of years to really good Stuart> effect with Outlook 2003. Stuart> Yesterday I accidentally clicked "spam" on a message that wasn't Stuart> spam. Today that person has told me his messages to be are Stuart> returned "you do not have permission to sent to this Stuart> recipient". All other mail is coming as normal. That must be an Outlook feature. SpamBayes does nothing other than compute a spamminess score for the messages it's fed. Stuart> * Does everyone on the spam list get a refusal to deliver Stuart> messages? I thought the messages just went into the spam Stuart> folder. I don't use Outlook, but in my environment, SpamBayes adds a header to the message with the computed score, then further downstream procmail tosses the message in the appropriate folder. -- Skip Montanaro - skip at pobox.com - http://www.smontanaro.net/