[Spambayes] Any ideas about this one?

[Skip Montanaro]

The message at

    http://manatee.mojam.com/~skip/junk.msg

scored squarely in the ham zone for me, mostly because the scoring was
swamped by all those normally good address clues (aahz, aleax
cosc.canterbury.ac.nz, etc).  I could obviously remove "to" from my
address_headers option.  I tried doing that, which moved it up near 0.5,
however I noticed no skip: tokens were generated:

    X-Spambayes-Classification: unsure; 0.46
    X-Spambayes-Debug: '*H*': 0.89; '*S*': 0.80;
            'x-mailer:microsoft outlook imo, build 9.0.2416
            (9.0.2911.0)': 0.01; 'subject:pack': 0.09; 'subject:: ': 0.19;
            'header:Message-ID:1': 0.35; 'subject:Watch': 0.75;
            'content-type:application/x-msdownload': 0.97;
            'filename:fname piece:exe': 0.97

Is that related to the structure of the message (causing the attachment to
be skipped altogether)?

Skip

P.S. I couldn't send the message itself to the list because the virus
detector rejected it, hence the URL above.  Should we allow stuff like that
to squeeze through to this list?

S