[Spambayes] Other pop3proxy options

[Tim Stone - Four Stones Expressions]

2/20/2003 3:52:42 PM, Terrel Shumway <tshumway at jdiworks.net> wrote:

>On Wednesday 19 February 2003 16:08, Tim Stone - Four Stones Expressions 
>wrote:
>
>> We're getting very close to requiring a full blown mail client, not just a
>> proxy.  Perhaps the solution to many problems is to provide a spambayes
>> mailer, with training, retraining, etc. etc. all built in, and provide the
>> proxy with necessarily limited function for those who don't wish to use the
>> spambayes mailer.  This thought is daunting, but it really is the easiest
>> from a useability standpoint.  - TimS
>
>I have not read this thread very closely yet, but I thought I would chime in.
>
>I am working on a complete mail server suite written in python. The pop3 
>server is working with a maildir backing store. The pop3 client "works" for 
>now, using poplib.py, but I will soon have an async version that supports 
>pipelining etc.  The smtp currently listener works for basic delivery, but 
>some fancy configuration stuff still needs to be worked out.  It is all 
>designed to be runnable as a single process with async listeners and 
>http-based configuration -- click and run.

There are some possibilities here, and at least you might look at 
incorporating spambayes into it for value-add sake.  You might take a look at 
our pop3proxy... - TimS

>
>Now I ask: could this help solve the problems you are discussing? It could be 
>used to make a smarter proxy that uses an intermediate store rather than an 
>online connection to an upstream server. 
>
>(Now I will go back and catch up on the discussion)
>
>-- Terrel
>
>
>
>


c'est moi - TimS
http://www.fourstonesExpressions.com
http://wecanstopspam.org