From sheri at spss.com Wed Feb 2 17:16:03 2005 From: sheri at spss.com (Gilley, Sheri) Date: Wed Feb 2 17:22:27 2005 Subject: [spambayes-dev] My "Delete as Spam" buttons stops working sometimes... Message-ID: <99B181F1EF9C774CB0245EAE7B8182D4F5B3DE@hqemail2.spss.com> For the last week, I've had trouble getting the "Delete as Spam" button to work reliably. I just now selected about 30 messages in the Junk Suspects folder, hit Delete As Spam, and it worked just fine, although there was a wait cursor for a long time. Then selected another 20 and the button does nothing. No wait cursor, no items moved. I tried changing to a different folder and then back, thinking it was a refresh problem, but no, the messages are still there. Sometmes, closing Outlook and reopening it works, but not always. HELP! How can I fix this so that I can continue training? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/spambayes-dev/attachments/20050202/81a96ad5/attachment.html From tameyer at ihug.co.nz Thu Feb 3 01:01:34 2005 From: tameyer at ihug.co.nz (Tony Meyer) Date: Thu Feb 3 01:01:40 2005 Subject: [spambayes-dev] My "Delete as Spam" buttons stops workingsometimes... In-Reply-To: Message-ID: > For the last week, I've had trouble getting the > "Delete as Spam" button to work reliably. I just now > selected about 30 messages in the Junk Suspects folder, > hit Delete As Spam, and it worked just fine, although > there was a wait cursor for a long time. Then selected > another 20 and the button does nothing. No wait cursor, > no items moved. I tried changing to a different folder > and then back, thinking it was a refresh problem, but no, > the messages are still there. Please send us a copy of a log file for a time during which this happened. The troubleshooting guide explains where to find the log files. =Tony.Meyer -- Please always include the list (spambayes@python.org) in your replies (reply-all), and please don't send me personal mail about SpamBayes. http://www.massey.ac.nz/~tameyer/writing/reply_all.html explains this. From hernan at orgmf.com.ar Thu Feb 3 10:07:02 2005 From: hernan at orgmf.com.ar (=?us-ascii?Q?Hernan_Martinez_Foffani?=) Date: Thu Feb 3 10:08:16 2005 Subject: MSVCR71.DLL (was RE: [spambayes-dev] RE: [Spambayes-checkins]spambayes/windowsspambayes.iss, 1.18, 1.19) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: > I'm still trying to get my head around what to do with msvcr71.dll. > Thomas Heller on the py2exe-users list said that he thinks that (in > his IANAL opinion) you need a license to redistribute mscvr71.dll. > If that's the case, then we can't include it with SpamBayes (I'll do > a 1.0.4 with Python > 2.3, and 1.1a1 can be built with 2.3 as well), AFAICT. > > If it is legit to include it, then we need to figure where to source > it. Either it's not distributed with Python or the Python install > puts it in windows\system32 (I haven't had a chance to check). > (Thomas's (again, IANAL) opinion was that it was legit for Python to > redistribute the dll. There was some discussion of this a while back > on python-dev, I believe). If Python does install it, then we can > just source it from wherever it gets put (the setup_all.py script can > do this). If Python doesn't install it, but we are going to, then a > manual copy is probably the only option, and we'll just have to > update README-DEVEL.txt. Please, don't place it in windows\system32. If Python installer does it, I think it's a bug if we follow http://tinyurl.com/q20a (second to last paragraph.) Can't we have a copy in SB\bin directory instead? IANAL neither but MSVCR71.DLL is included in the Redist.txt file (search for it in VS.NET distro.) That file say nothing about restrictions on the distribution although I admit couldn't find the CLUF in my VS.NET installation to be completely sure. I know it means nothing but WinCvs and TortoiseSVN (just to name a few) distribute it too. BTW, I hope can help you with i18n again from this weekend on. From hernan at orgmf.com.ar Thu Feb 3 11:55:31 2005 From: hernan at orgmf.com.ar (=?us-ascii?Q?Hernan_Martinez_Foffani?=) Date: Thu Feb 3 11:56:45 2005 Subject: MSVCR71.DLL (was RE: [spambayes-dev] RE:[Spambayes-checkins]spambayes/windowsspambayes.iss, 1.18, 1.19) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: I said: > IANAL neither but MSVCR71.DLL is included in the Redist.txt file > (search for it in VS.NET distro.) That file say nothing about > restrictions on the distribution although I admit couldn't find the > CLUF in my VS.NET installation to be completely sure. > I know it means nothing but WinCvs and TortoiseSVN (just to name a > few) distribute it too. I've read the EULA and in my understanding the only doubt is in the last paragraph of 3.1.a that talks about final users and distributors. In a restricted view any py2exe application that bundles msvcr71.dll infringe this point unless the programmer owns a legit copy of VS.NET or equivalent and/or such programmer also distributes Python. Can't we have a PythonConsole.exe in SB/bin? :-P Disclaimer: The EULA I'm reading is the spanish version. Besides and again IANAL. -H. From hernan at orgmf.com.ar Thu Feb 3 17:30:42 2005 From: hernan at orgmf.com.ar (=?us-ascii?Q?Hernan_Martinez_Foffani?=) Date: Thu Feb 3 17:31:58 2005 Subject: [spambayes-dev] 1.0.2 and 1.1a1 In-Reply-To: <41f9198c.367236f1.373e.0927@smtp.gmail.com> Message-ID: >>> Given that we haven't been able to solve the bsddb >>> corruption/run-recovery problem, >> >> I've completely given up and am happy in my ZODB.FileStorage world >> <0.1 wink>. I'd like to include the necessary ZODB stuff in a a1 >> build so that people can give ZODB a go if they would like, assuming >> that it doesn't bloat the installer too much. > > I played around a little with a SQLite classifier also, which is very > lightweight to install. It was pretty slow when working with the 2.8 > version because of the way we do our commits, but I'd like to give it > another go with the 3.0 version of SQLite to see if the situation has > improved. Maybe I can get this in for 1.1a2 so that it could get some > testing. Right now, I don't know if it would really be any more > stable than bsd or not. Hope you don't mind (I don't know if you already knew if or applies) but are you aware that the Subversion core dev team currently advise against the use of bsddb 4.1 versions? They recomend either 4.0 or 4.2. http://www.subversion.org/faq.html#bdb41-tabletype-bug In Python 2.3.4 (that's what I've got installed): >>> import bsddb >>> bsddb._db.version() (4, 1, 25) >>> bsddb._db.DB_VERSION_STRING 'Sleepycat Software: Berkeley DB 4.1.25: (December 19, 2002)' >>> BTW, Sorry for my comments about MSVCR71.DLL. I've just seen (in other mailing lists) that you knew all the points I raised in my previous emails. Regards, -H. From tameyer at ihug.co.nz Thu Feb 3 22:33:43 2005 From: tameyer at ihug.co.nz (Tony Meyer) Date: Thu Feb 3 22:33:48 2005 Subject: [spambayes-dev] RE: MSVCR71.DLL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: > > I'm still trying to get my head around what to do with msvcr71.dll. [...] > Please, don't place it in windows\system32. We won't. If it is included, then it will be in the spambayes/bin directory - as with 1.0.3. > If Python installer does it, I think it's a bug if we follow > http://tinyurl.com/q20a (second to last > paragraph.) Python needs it there (that text says that it should be avoided, not that it is not permitted). If you are interested, the reasons are outlined here: > IANAL neither but MSVCR71.DLL is included in the Redist.txt > file (search for it in VS.NET distro.) There's a thread about this on python-dev. Subject to various conditions, it is ok to distribute it if you have a copy of one of the (non-free) Microsoft compilers. The free compiler does not include distribution permission. I do not own any of the non-free Microsoft compilers (although other SpamBayes developers do, so we can be distributing theirs). > That file say nothing > about restrictions on the distribution although I admit > couldn't find the CLUF in my VS.NET installation to be > completely sure. The EULA for Visual C++ Toolkit 2003 is here: =Tony.Meyer From mike at ourislands.com Fri Feb 4 18:47:53 2005 From: mike at ourislands.com (Mike Kaiser) Date: Fri Feb 4 18:48:02 2005 Subject: [spambayes-dev] weird stuff Message-ID: <20050204174759.FSQV2069.imf21aec.mail.bellsouth.net@mikeshpnotebook> This morning I found that neither of my SpamBayes buttons on the Outlook toolbar would work. I could press them, but nothing happened. I used Add/Remove Programs to uninstall, then reinstalled. Same result. I looked online for a newer version and downloaded 1.0.3 (I had been using 1.0rc2), and found the same result. I uninstalled again, then manually removed the SpamBayes toolbar from Outlook. Now when I reinstall 1.0.3, there is no SpamBayes toolbar added. Any ideas? Thanks. __________________ Mike Kaiser mike@ourislands.com www.ourmaineisland.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/spambayes-dev/attachments/20050204/a3bca88e/attachment.html From tameyer at ihug.co.nz Mon Feb 7 05:48:40 2005 From: tameyer at ihug.co.nz (Tony Meyer) Date: Mon Feb 7 05:48:45 2005 Subject: [spambayes-dev] 1.0.2 and 1.1a1 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: > Hope you don't mind (I don't know if you already knew if or applies) > but are you aware that the Subversion core dev team currently advise > against the use of bsddb 4.1 versions? They recomend either > 4.0 or 4.2. > http://www.subversion.org/faq.html#bdb41-tabletype-bug I didn't know this. I don't know enough about bsddb or how Python/SpamBayes uses it to know whether any problems it has effects or not, either, though. > In Python 2.3.4 (that's what I've got installed): > > >>> import bsddb > >>> bsddb._db.version() > (4, 1, 25) > >>> bsddb._db.DB_VERSION_STRING > 'Sleepycat Software: Berkeley DB 4.1.25: (December 19, 2002)' > >>> Python 2.4 has 4.2: Python 2.4 (#60, Nov 30 2004, 11:49:19) [MSC v.1310 32 bit (Intel)] on win32 Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information. >>> import bsddb >>> bsddb._db.version() (4, 2, 52) >>> bsddb._db.DB_VERSION_STRING 'Sleepycat Software: Berkeley DB 4.2.52: (December 3, 2003)' So if the builds stay with 2.4*, we'll also get the improved bsddb, which might help. * I'll leave 1.0.3 with 2.4 - if people want 2.3, then there's 1.0.1 or the source. I'd like 1.1a1 to use 2.4, but also want to include the Zope stuff necessary for ZODBStorage, and there isn't a 2.4 binary for that yet AFAIK. Not sure what I'll do about that yet (but I ought to hurry up and figure it out). =Tony.Meyer From hernan at orgmf.com.ar Mon Feb 7 10:30:03 2005 From: hernan at orgmf.com.ar (=?us-ascii?Q?Hernan_Martinez_Foffani?=) Date: Mon Feb 7 10:31:26 2005 Subject: [spambayes-dev] 1.0.2 and 1.1a1 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: On bsddb, > Python 2.4 has 4.2: > > Python 2.4 (#60, Nov 30 2004, 11:49:19) [MSC v.1310 32 bit (Intel)] > on win32 Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more > information. >>>> import bsddb >>>> bsddb._db.version() > (4, 2, 52) >>>> bsddb._db.DB_VERSION_STRING > 'Sleepycat Software: Berkeley DB 4.2.52: (December 3, 2003)' > > So if the builds stay with 2.4*, we'll also get the improved bsddb, > which might help. > > * I'll leave 1.0.3 with 2.4 - if people want 2.3, then there's 1.0.1 > or the source. I'd like 1.1a1 to use 2.4, but also want to include > the Zope stuff necessary for ZODBStorage, and there isn't a 2.4 > binary for that yet AFAIK. Not sure what I'll do about that yet (but > I ought to hurry up and figure it out). Having done a short overview of pybsddb CHANGES.txt doc it seems it's possible to use python 2.3 bindings for bsddb versions 4.2 & 4.3. Don't take that for granted though, I've never used bsddb before (or anydbm for this matter) in my python programs. -H. From beta_nunessdkdj8374 at hotmail.com Wed Feb 9 13:05:59 2005 From: beta_nunessdkdj8374 at hotmail.com (Roberta Nunes) Date: Wed Feb 9 13:06:14 2005 Subject: [spambayes-dev] =?iso-8859-1?q?MALA_DIRETA_DE_E-MAILS_SEGMENTADO?= =?iso-8859-1?q?S_GEN=C9RICOS_MIRADOS_FOCADOS_http=3A//www=2Egueb?= =?iso-8859-1?q?=2Ede/segmails?= Message-ID: <20050209120610.8D00C1E4017@bag.python.org> .. MALA DIRETA DE E-MAILS SEGMENTADOS GEN?RICOS MIRADOS FOCADOS http://www.gueb.de/segmails @ Listas de E-Mails Mala Direta E-mails Segmentados ou E-mails Gen?ricos Marketing Direto Divulga??o Visite agora: http://www.gueb.de/segmails . CADASTRAMENTO DE HOME PAGES EM MILHARES DE SITES DE BUSCAS NO BRASIL E NO MUNDO . MALA DIRETA DE EMAILS SEGMENTADA . MALA DIRETA DE EMAILS GEN?RICA . VALIDA??O DE LISTAS E-MAILS . SMS (MENSANGENS A CELULAR ) . ICQ 9(MENSANGENS A ICQ ) Visite agora: http://www.gueb.de/segmails bulk mail,mailing list,e-maling,listas,cadastros,email,emaiu,emeiu,emaiu,emaius e-mails para mala direta,e-mails,emails,email,emaio,listas de e-mails,mailing list,listagem,cadastros,listas de e-mail,marketing direto,mmv,publicidade,divulga??o,mp3,e-mails segmentados,home page,bulk mail,playboy,propaganda,maladireta,maling list,sexo E-mails para Mala Direta/Marketing Direto gen?ricos ou segmentados por ramo de atividade,sexo,idade,cidade,estado Visite agora: http://www.gueb.de/segmails Cadastramento de Home Page em sites de buscas,otimiza??o,dicas e downloads gr?tis From lists at idealint.co.uk Thu Feb 10 20:55:15 2005 From: lists at idealint.co.uk (Jinn K) Date: Thu Feb 10 20:55:11 2005 Subject: [spambayes-dev] sb_imapfilter -u %d -b ### should be ### sb_imapfilter -o html_ui:port:%d -b Message-ID: <1108065315.14332.3.camel@morph.magic-lamp.org> Good day! Thanks for spambayes. Working wonderfully for a long time now. And quite reliably with sb_imapfilter and Cyrus IMAP. I noticed on the FAQ that question 4.20 states that one can use the following if something is already running on 8880. sb_imapfilter -u %d -b However sb_imapfilter from 1.0.3 doesn't recognise the -u option. Instead I used this: sb_imapfilter -o html_ui:port:%d -b Thanks again, Jinn From tameyer at ihug.co.nz Thu Feb 10 22:46:31 2005 From: tameyer at ihug.co.nz (Tony Meyer) Date: Thu Feb 10 22:46:46 2005 Subject: [spambayes-dev] sb_imapfilter -u %d -b ### should be ###sb_imapfilter -o html_ui:port:%d -b In-Reply-To: Message-ID: > I noticed on the FAQ that question 4.20 states that one can use the > following if something is already running on 8880. > > sb_imapfilter -u %d -b > > However sb_imapfilter from 1.0.3 doesn't recognise the -u option. Actually, I don't think sb_imapfilter has ever supported the -u option (it certainly hasn't in any non-alpha release). > Instead I used this: > > sb_imapfilter -o html_ui:port:%d -b Yes, that or entering that in the configuration file (in the form "[html_ui]\nport:%d") would work. I'll update the FAQ. Thanks! =Tony.Meyer From kenny.pitt at gmail.com Fri Feb 11 22:10:52 2005 From: kenny.pitt at gmail.com (Kenny Pitt) Date: Fri Feb 11 22:11:02 2005 Subject: [spambayes-dev] 1.0.2 and 1.1a1 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <420d1f5d.3a4ae75e.0cec.1522@smtp.gmail.com> Tony Meyer wrote: >> There's a win32gui.GetOpenFileName() method that provides a >> lower-level interface to the open dialog. It requires you to >> manually construct the Win32 API OPENFILENAME structure and >> pass it in as a string, and I haven't had time to figure out >> how to do that yet. > > There's an example here: > > > > It's for Windows CE, I think, but is probably more-or-less the same :) Thanks for the reference, Tony. I used the example as a starting point, and I just checked in the updates for configuring notification sounds with full file-browse support. Note to translators: The new dialog resource for the Notifications tab will need to be added to all existing translations. -- Kenny Pitt From bi77p at attglobal.net Mon Feb 14 07:13:44 2005 From: bi77p at attglobal.net (peter) Date: Mon Feb 14 07:13:42 2005 Subject: [spambayes-dev] Spam-Bayes and Poco Mai - a beginners question.l Message-ID: <2005213221344.967593@wine> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/spambayes-dev/attachments/20050213/e4f1124d/attachment.htm From Billing at paypal.com Sun Feb 13 13:19:46 2005 From: Billing at paypal.com (Paypal Billing) Date: Mon Feb 14 21:54:51 2005 Subject: [spambayes-dev] Paypal Account Security Measurs Message-ID: An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/spambayes-dev/attachments/20050213/4afdc12c/attachment.htm From sjoerd at acm.org Fri Feb 18 11:48:01 2005 From: sjoerd at acm.org (Sjoerd Mullender) Date: Fri Feb 18 11:48:08 2005 Subject: [spambayes-dev] sb_imapfilter with multiple accounts Message-ID: <4215C7E1.9060002@acm.org> It is now possible (thanks to Tony Meyer) to have a single instance of sb_imapfilter deal with multiple IMAP accounts. That's great. However, it seems to me that there is something lacking in what you can specify in the config file. The way things are implemented (and I don't see how it can be done differently currently) is that for each of the accounts, all mail folders in the imap:filter_folders configuration variale are filtered. But it may well be that the different accounts use different sets of folders. In my case it's even worse. I use two sb_imapfilter setups with different filter_folders, but also with different cutoff values. Has anybody given these kinds of problems any thought? -- Sjoerd Mullender -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 374 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature Url : http://mail.python.org/pipermail/spambayes-dev/attachments/20050218/2a5922a0/signature.pgp From gsb at direcway.com Mon Feb 21 02:03:09 2005 From: gsb at direcway.com (Gerri Bernstein) Date: Mon Feb 21 02:03:33 2005 Subject: [spambayes-dev] multiple addresses Message-ID: <4219334D.808@direcway.com> How do I set up spam bayes for two different email addresses. When I installed the program it only showed one of the addresses. thanks From benshul at pacbell.net Mon Feb 21 02:15:14 2005 From: benshul at pacbell.net (Ben Shulman) Date: Mon Feb 21 16:25:33 2005 Subject: [spambayes-dev] Can you filter this kind of spam? Message-ID: <000501c517b2$cc46b290$0400a8c0@BenShulmanDell> Skipped content of type multipart/alternative-------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: "Clifton Lang" Subject: Ionamine helping considerably overweight people undid l0se veight and keep it off Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 14:24:21 -0800 Size: 19053 Url: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/spambayes-dev/attachments/20050220/bbac9bb4/attachment-0001.mht From juliocastro98745 at mail.com Mon Feb 21 22:32:14 2005 From: juliocastro98745 at mail.com (Julio Castro) Date: Mon Feb 21 22:57:16 2005 Subject: [spambayes-dev] =?iso-8859-1?q?cadastros_de_e-mails_por_profiss?= =?iso-8859-1?q?=E3o?= Message-ID: <20050221213158.0B4948984@scorpion3.uol.com.br> listas de emails por provedores de acesso, Cadastros para spam e mala direta, anuncios e divulga??o por e-mail. Visite agora: http://www.gueb.de/segmails programas de envio e captura de e-mails atualizados, listas de e-mails por categorias , cadastros de e-mails por profiss?o, Cadastros para spam e mala direta: http://www.gueb.de/segmails -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/spambayes-dev/attachments/20050221/19003f4d/attachment.html From atifm80 at hotmail.com Sun Feb 27 00:00:39 2005 From: atifm80 at hotmail.com (Atif Munir) Date: Sun Feb 27 00:01:04 2005 Subject: [spambayes-dev] SpamBayes Message-ID: Hi I’m currently doing a study, as part of my degree, to investigate whether diversity can be applied to spam filters to improve their effectiveness. I just had a few questions regarding SpamBayes. Is it possible to pipe/redirect messages through spambayes one at a time using the DOS command line to classify messages? If so what would the command look like for a message named ‘test.txt’ (for example). Also once the message has been piped through how can I then check whether it has been classified as spam/ham or unsure? Many thanks Atif From fctr at nac.net Sun Feb 27 18:14:20 2005 From: fctr at nac.net (From Concept To Reality, L.L.C.) Date: Sun Feb 27 18:14:26 2005 Subject: [spambayes-dev] Windows/Unix(?) Command Line Training Message-ID: <20050227171425.0F8281E4005@bag.python.org> Greetings one and all: I am a STAUNCH opponent of Micro$oft Outlook and all it's flavors and have decided to instead use PMMail 2000. Since SPAMBayes has no plugin for PMMail 2000, I use the proxy. HOWEVER, it's not easy to "automatically" train e-mail from PMMail 2000. So, I've written some command line code that connects to the SPAMBayes webserver and trains on a filename. The source code is located at: http://uses.nac.net/fctr/spambayes/trainasspam.cpp And for MSVC 6.0 users: http://uses.nac.net/fctr/spambayes/trainasspam.dsp http://uses.nac.net/fctr/spambayes/trainasspam.dsw And for Windows 9x/ME/2000/XP/2003 users: http://uses.nac.net/fctr/spambayes/trainasspam.exe http://uses.nac.net/fctr/spambayes/trainasham.exe I've compressed the binaries with UPX, for size. The command line looks like this: C:\> TrainAsSpam FalseNegativeMessage.txt -OR- C:\> TrainAsHam FalsePositiveMessage.txt I'm not a UNIX programmer, but I'm 99% sure the code is compatible with most/all UNIX flavors. Any suggestions/upgrades would be most helpful. Enjoy! Sincerely, Andrew Burns +=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=+ | From Concept To Reality, LLC. | | (fctr@nac.net) | | http://users.nac.net/fctr | +=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=+ | Voice: (908) 879-3274 | | FAX: (908) 879-3275 | +=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=+ From fctr at nac.net Mon Feb 28 16:48:25 2005 From: fctr at nac.net (From Concept To Reality, L.L.C.) Date: Mon Feb 28 20:01:08 2005 Subject: [spambayes-dev] Bug Report Message-ID: <20050228190107.B79FC1E4003@bag.python.org> Greetings: I've found a reproducible (and serious) bug in the SPAMBayes Windows version of the POP3PROXY. The failure occurs in the service EXE as well as the standalone executable. Step to recreate the problem: * Start SPAMBayes POP3PROXY(service or standalone) * Using a dialup (or otherwise slow connection), connect to the internet. * Start downloading a HUGE file using Firefox (or any other browser) * Run your email client What seems to happen is: * Email client connects to POP3PROXY * POP3PROXY tries to connect to proxied mail server * POP3PROXY goes into an infinite loop, FILLING up it's log file with the same error message and the CPU usage goes to 100%. Sadly this is not 100% reproducible on my machine, but given enough time (an hour or so), this is guaranteed to happen. I'm not a Python programmer, so I wouldn't know where to start debugging. Suggestions? Sincerely, Andrew Burns +=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=+ | From Concept To Reality, LLC. | | (fctr@nac.net) | | http://users.nac.net/fctr | +=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=+ | Voice: (908) 879-3274 | | FAX: (908) 879-3275 | +=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=+ From skip at pobox.com Mon Feb 28 20:49:42 2005 From: skip at pobox.com (Skip Montanaro) Date: Mon Feb 28 20:49:47 2005 Subject: [spambayes-dev] Bug Report In-Reply-To: <20050228190107.B79FC1E4003@bag.python.org> References: <20050228190107.B79FC1E4003@bag.python.org> Message-ID: <16931.30166.985922.625823@montanaro.dyndns.org> Andrew> What seems to happen is: Andrew> * Email client connects to POP3PROXY Andrew> * POP3PROXY tries to connect to proxied mail server Andrew> * POP3PROXY goes into an infinite loop, FILLING up it's log file Andrew> with the same error message and the CPU usage goes to 100%. Can you give us a short sample of the log file error messages you see? Skip From kenny.pitt at gmail.com Mon Feb 28 21:16:23 2005 From: kenny.pitt at gmail.com (Kenny Pitt) Date: Mon Feb 28 21:16:26 2005 Subject: [spambayes-dev] Bug Report In-Reply-To: <16931.30166.985922.625823@montanaro.dyndns.org> Message-ID: <42237c16.4d75bd23.0743.1088@smtp.gmail.com> Skip Montanaro wrote: > Andrew> What seems to happen is: > Andrew> * Email client connects to POP3PROXY > Andrew> * POP3PROXY tries to connect to proxied mail server > Andrew> * POP3PROXY goes into an infinite loop, FILLING up it's > log file Andrew> with the same error message and the CPU usage > goes to 100%. > > Can you give us a short sample of the log file error messages you see? This is a known problem. See bug #1113863 and bug #1145057: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=61702&atid=498103&func=detail&aid=1 113863http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=61702&atid=498103&func=detail &aid=1145057 >From Tony's response to that bug: """ Changes have been made for 1.1 that limit the number of times identical errors are recorded, which will help those that continually get the same error (people that try to connect when the server is unavailable, for example). """ -- Kenny Pitt From kenny.pitt at gmail.com Mon Feb 28 21:20:34 2005 From: kenny.pitt at gmail.com (Kenny Pitt) Date: Mon Feb 28 21:20:38 2005 Subject: [spambayes-dev] Bug Report In-Reply-To: <16931.30166.985922.625823@montanaro.dyndns.org> Message-ID: <42237d12.06353cd2.358d.0229@smtp.gmail.com> Skip Montanaro wrote: > Andrew> What seems to happen is: > Andrew> * Email client connects to POP3PROXY > Andrew> * POP3PROXY tries to connect to proxied mail server > Andrew> * POP3PROXY goes into an infinite loop, FILLING up it's log file > Andrew> with the same error message and the CPU usage goes to 100%. > > Can you give us a short sample of the log file error messages you see? There are times when Outlook's URL handling just really annoys me! <0.5 wink> Here's the completed version of the response that got sent before I was done with it: This is a known problem. See bug #1113863 and bug #1145057: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=61702&atid=498103&func=detail&aid=1 113863 http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=61702&atid=498103&func=detail&aid=1 145057 >From Tony's response to bug #1145057: """ Changes have been made for 1.1 that limit the number of times identical errors are recorded, which will help those that continually get the same error (people that try to connect when the server is unavailable, for example). """ Tony's fix makes it so that each distinct connection error is only logged once per hour. -- Kenny Pitt From fctr at nac.net Mon Feb 28 21:36:49 2005 From: fctr at nac.net (From Concept To Reality, L.L.C.) Date: Mon Feb 28 22:03:33 2005 Subject: [spambayes-dev] My previous bug report Message-ID: <20050228210333.1B2C51E4006@bag.python.org> OK guys (and gals), the lesson learned here today is that I can't read and should check the bug reports before spouting off. Next question: When is v1.1 being released so I can finally recommend it as a corporate solution? Sincerely, Andrew Burns +=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=+ | From Concept To Reality, LLC. | | (fctr@nac.net) | | http://users.nac.net/fctr | +=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=+ | Voice: (908) 879-3274 | | FAX: (908) 879-3275 | +=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=+